Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-01-21 📝 Original message:DERSIG BIP looks great to ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-01-21
📝 Original message:DERSIG BIP looks great to me, just a few nit-picky changes suggested:

You mention the "DER standard" : should link to
http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com17/languages/X.690-0207.pdf (or
whatever is best reference for DER).

"this would simplify avoiding OpenSSL in consensus implementations" -->
"this would make it easier for non-OpenSSL implementations"

"causing opcode failure" : I know what you mean by "opcode failure", but
it might be good to be more explicit.

"since v0.8.0, and nearly no transactions" --> "and very few
transactions..."

"reducing this avenue for malleability is useful on itself as well" :
awkward English. How about just "This proposal has the added benefit of
reducing transaction malleability (see BIP62)."


--
--
Gavin Andresen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150121/c90302a5/attachment.html>;