📅 Original date posted:2018-11-16
📝 Original message:Ah, ok. I've worked with the non-BIP39 Electrum mnemonics, which have
this behaviour, but haven't tried the BIP39 support within it.
Thanks,
-Neill.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:05:50PM +0900, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> Nope.
>
> This is how Electrum treats BIP39 restoring as well, try it out.
>
> -Jon
>
> 2018年11月16日(金) 23:04、Neill Miller さん（neillm at thecodefactory.org）のメッセージ:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:17:30PM +0900, Jonathan Underwood via
> > bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > > If more apps would implement to the word of the BIP39 spec, multiple
> > > languages make sense, but since reality is no one follows the spec (/the
> > > spec is way too open to interpretation) then expecting every app to load
> > > every language is unreasonable.
> > >
> > > Electrum actually handles BIP39 recovery the way the BIP specifies. I can
> > > restore random strings if I want, and it warns me, and I can ignore it
> > if I
> > > wish.
> >
> > Electrum mnemonics are not based on BIP39, which is why it can do
> > this.
> >
> > -Neill.
> >
> >
Neill Miller [ARCHIVE] /
npub1gr…dc7xt
2023-06-07 18:15:13
in reply to nevent1q…yp97
Author Public Key
npub1grjskzn5x0sr7nks7f73nxdv3h0ft8q67sqs22ycwv0hatndtn3qldc7xtPublished at
2023-06-07 18:15:13Event JSON
{
"id": "bbf19139ada225bdd322982383b6b06d5afe4180389a2cb66139783bac88f277",
"pubkey": "40e50b0a7433e03f4ed0f27d1999ac8dde959c1af401052898731f7eae6d5ce2",
"created_at": 1686161713,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"34a53e4711f2ebfd1da22ab3ae089c3e859e01ca74d42a8cea7fe29f629b9469",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"115797f0e8c39f0995a98da64d1255a7d3cbdb5a847e869f7143876233953340",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"e999edd1a420e7d5e19be7870cbcfa798bb98cb408e5929a2a18181c8c6f1dee"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-11-16\n📝 Original message:Ah, ok. I've worked with the non-BIP39 Electrum mnemonics, which have\nthis behaviour, but haven't tried the BIP39 support within it.\n\nThanks,\n-Neill.\n\nOn Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:05:50PM +0900, Jonathan Underwood wrote:\n\u003e Nope.\n\u003e \n\u003e This is how Electrum treats BIP39 restoring as well, try it out.\n\u003e \n\u003e -Jon\n\u003e \n\u003e 2018年11月16日(金) 23:04、Neill Miller さん（neillm at thecodefactory.org）のメッセージ:\n\u003e \n\u003e \u003e On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:17:30PM +0900, Jonathan Underwood via\n\u003e \u003e bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e If more apps would implement to the word of the BIP39 spec, multiple\n\u003e \u003e \u003e languages make sense, but since reality is no one follows the spec (/the\n\u003e \u003e \u003e spec is way too open to interpretation) then expecting every app to load\n\u003e \u003e \u003e every language is unreasonable.\n\u003e \u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e \u003e Electrum actually handles BIP39 recovery the way the BIP specifies. I can\n\u003e \u003e \u003e restore random strings if I want, and it warns me, and I can ignore it\n\u003e \u003e if I\n\u003e \u003e \u003e wish.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Electrum mnemonics are not based on BIP39, which is why it can do\n\u003e \u003e this.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e -Neill.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e",
"sig": "7105bad0072aed64b2b092a753e78793f99ee9e619815633ee87bb0abd74421291a3356c310501bca5534d02c83f66f73b0aa407b804ca345f33ba6e56582373"
}