📅 Original date posted:2018-11-16
📝 Original message:Nope.
This is how Electrum treats BIP39 restoring as well, try it out.
-Jon
2018年11月16日(金) 23:04、Neill Miller さん（neillm at thecodefactory.org）のメッセージ:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:17:30PM +0900, Jonathan Underwood via
> bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > If more apps would implement to the word of the BIP39 spec, multiple
> > languages make sense, but since reality is no one follows the spec (/the
> > spec is way too open to interpretation) then expecting every app to load
> > every language is unreasonable.
> >
> > Electrum actually handles BIP39 recovery the way the BIP specifies. I can
> > restore random strings if I want, and it warns me, and I can ignore it
> if I
> > wish.
>
> Electrum mnemonics are not based on BIP39, which is why it can do
> this.
>
> -Neill.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20181116/545faa2c/attachment.html>;
Jonathan Underwood [ARCHIVE] /
npub1ax…0ftr0
2023-06-07 18:15:13
in reply to nevent1q…g39u
Author Public Key
npub1axv7m5dyyrnatcvmu7rse0860x9mnr95prje9x32rqvperr0rhhqp0ftr0Published at
2023-06-07 18:15:13Event JSON
{
"id": "115797f0e8c39f0995a98da64d1255a7d3cbdb5a847e869f7143876233953340",
"pubkey": "e999edd1a420e7d5e19be7870cbcfa798bb98cb408e5929a2a18181c8c6f1dee",
"created_at": 1686161713,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"34a53e4711f2ebfd1da22ab3ae089c3e859e01ca74d42a8cea7fe29f629b9469",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"957a7e30502813a66ccb40664fe6057526c1aa0d0288103f838e06c34c26e95e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"40e50b0a7433e03f4ed0f27d1999ac8dde959c1af401052898731f7eae6d5ce2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-11-16\n📝 Original message:Nope.\n\nThis is how Electrum treats BIP39 restoring as well, try it out.\n\n-Jon\n\n2018年11月16日(金) 23:04、Neill Miller さん（neillm at thecodefactory.org）のメッセージ:\n\n\u003e On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:17:30PM +0900, Jonathan Underwood via\n\u003e bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e \u003e If more apps would implement to the word of the BIP39 spec, multiple\n\u003e \u003e languages make sense, but since reality is no one follows the spec (/the\n\u003e \u003e spec is way too open to interpretation) then expecting every app to load\n\u003e \u003e every language is unreasonable.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Electrum actually handles BIP39 recovery the way the BIP specifies. I can\n\u003e \u003e restore random strings if I want, and it warns me, and I can ignore it\n\u003e if I\n\u003e \u003e wish.\n\u003e\n\u003e Electrum mnemonics are not based on BIP39, which is why it can do\n\u003e this.\n\u003e\n\u003e -Neill.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20181116/545faa2c/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "e97342517105ac39fb682d4ef7aa50b47c1d95dc154f14c1d14148c92c706f09039775e7d56449707bfb309c3df6e8055083f6edb41f1cee038a30d10b47ad75"
}