📅 Original date posted:2015-06-11
📝 Original message:Peter Todd wrote:
> Re: "dropped in an unpredictable way" - transactions would be dropped
> lowest fee/KB first, a completely predictable way.
It would be 'completely predictable' for whoever knew the state and
policies of a miner's mempool, but from an end user's perspective that
wouldn't matter much: The end users wouldn't know if their
transaction(s) would make the cut or not, somewhere in the network, and
by what time. They (obviously) won't know what miners will find the next
block(s), they won't know the miners' mempool sizes, potential custom
eviction policies, etc.
I agree that this can be somewhat remedied by FSSRBF/CPFP, though,
provided wallets give users a good (semi-automated?) interface for such
transaction replacements/chains.
--
Martin Lie
Martin Lie [ARCHIVE] /
npub1mh…njm04
2023-06-07 15:37:20
in reply to nevent1q…s85s
Author Public Key
npub1mh4z8dskjdnvvxmgxryqwutheydpl2d5zphp8j9thc3jsnespa0qanjm04Published at
2023-06-07 15:37:20Event JSON
{
"id": "3981542ecf780e32eb14e01188dd6efa6193680c916dbd3ab7c6b5f7390b2d39",
"pubkey": "ddea23b6169366c61b6830c8077177c91a1fa9b4106e13c8abbe23284f300f5e",
"created_at": 1686152240,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e5c5b327043fce5d06c04d5d47b9e1bc42816638599cdc94c838afd2a20dc49c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c7ad1d070bcdd9dc9df0bf663fef0ba2039b02c31d8f530ba59b0d276c949862",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-11\n📝 Original message:Peter Todd wrote:\n\u003e Re: \"dropped in an unpredictable way\" - transactions would be dropped\n\u003e lowest fee/KB first, a completely predictable way.\n\nIt would be 'completely predictable' for whoever knew the state and \npolicies of a miner's mempool, but from an end user's perspective that \nwouldn't matter much: The end users wouldn't know if their \ntransaction(s) would make the cut or not, somewhere in the network, and \nby what time. They (obviously) won't know what miners will find the next \nblock(s), they won't know the miners' mempool sizes, potential custom \neviction policies, etc.\n\nI agree that this can be somewhat remedied by FSSRBF/CPFP, though, \nprovided wallets give users a good (semi-automated?) interface for such \ntransaction replacements/chains.\n\n\n-- \nMartin Lie",
"sig": "5966a375203c81473cfa010151bf48ad82180cae104a165f18c4699fc768ff2e13980aea9dcb7d650d8dd7df46ba1cf308052f91749b2a9314fe022529ff4913"
}