Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-11 📝 Original message:On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-06-11
📝 Original message:On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:18:30PM -0700, Aaron Voisine wrote:
> The other complication is that this will tend to be a lagging indicator
> based on network congestion from the last time you connected. If we assume
> that transactions are being dropped in an unpredictable way when blocks are
> full, knowing the network congestion *right now* is critical, and even then
> you just have to hope that someone who wants that space more than you do
> doesn't show up after you disconnect.
Hence the need for ways to increase fees on transactions after initial
broadcast like replace-by-fee and child-pays-for-parent.
Re: "dropped in an unpredictable way" - transactions would be dropped
lowest fee/KB first, a completely predictable way.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000000124bae79afdcee9267b4e6f8137758b8b4135455cd8e3bfd
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150611/b3d975d6/attachment.sig>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:37:19Event JSON
{
"id": "c7ad1d070bcdd9dc9df0bf663fef0ba2039b02c31d8f530ba59b0d276c949862",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686152239,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e5c5b327043fce5d06c04d5d47b9e1bc42816638599cdc94c838afd2a20dc49c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"aa4edd439865701d80da91d700a78d69a6500ca9699777a865ca81acb9522839",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-11\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:18:30PM -0700, Aaron Voisine wrote:\n\u003e The other complication is that this will tend to be a lagging indicator\n\u003e based on network congestion from the last time you connected. If we assume\n\u003e that transactions are being dropped in an unpredictable way when blocks are\n\u003e full, knowing the network congestion *right now* is critical, and even then\n\u003e you just have to hope that someone who wants that space more than you do\n\u003e doesn't show up after you disconnect.\n\nHence the need for ways to increase fees on transactions after initial\nbroadcast like replace-by-fee and child-pays-for-parent.\n\nRe: \"dropped in an unpredictable way\" - transactions would be dropped\nlowest fee/KB first, a completely predictable way.\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n0000000000000000124bae79afdcee9267b4e6f8137758b8b4135455cd8e3bfd\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 650 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150611/b3d975d6/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "30577d407aa83825774e8128d3619a4459db85e0959e603805d92fc2085b269b4f7d19b70eabe5fe16a3d5e644b86bfaad5f789be7fdcabd17e3a50e5abf4a63"
}