On August 5, Pierson and Debrow reported that none of their clients were interested in offers of immunity.
On October 3, Willis filed a motion to disqualify Pierson and Debrow in their simultaneous representation of the above 11 persons.
November 30: The court ruled that Pierson and Dubrow could represent Shafer or the other ten electors, but not both.
They agreed that Pierson would represent Shafer and Debrow would represent the others.
So they split up.
5/
Teri Kanefield /
npub10d…avnsf
2023-04-18 18:50:11
in reply to nevent1q…vcxg
Author Public Key
npub10dw8nkvktm3kt87ylq3l4eneuwu5czczturc7ngdk3dr89tjcp4q4avnsfSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-04-18 18:50:11Event JSON
{
"id": "347ea78f47691e66ae563916ccf79caf9091591fd3c616c5f79a45a29236df18",
"pubkey": "7b5c79d9965ee3659fc4f823fae679e3b94c0b025f078f4d0db45a339572c06a",
"created_at": 1681843811,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"99cd650541362f000dd7c720c1435388b064f87d5d7ace146698528f8c5c6ac4",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://law-and-politics.online/users/Teri_Kanefield/statuses/110221316045860169"
]
],
"content": "On August 5, Pierson and Debrow reported that none of their clients were interested in offers of immunity.\n\nOn October 3, Willis filed a motion to disqualify Pierson and Debrow in their simultaneous representation of the above 11 persons. \n\nNovember 30: The court ruled that Pierson and Dubrow could represent Shafer or the other ten electors, but not both.\n\nThey agreed that Pierson would represent Shafer and Debrow would represent the others.\n\nSo they split up. \n\n5/",
"sig": "a20979245763a7e529f6ffea989fc9d4ffb8294cdae1348b7d92a5795f3d42bd0b674cef0f5f2fcb3510bfa1a2454dc6b8e5c8b2dc2dd18b9bbbb6bae1446890"
}