quotingWalking Thoughts:
nevent1q…h80x
The idea that Ai will take over everything and humans will have nothing to do is the same as saying there will be nothing left to learn.
Currently, all Ai is trained on words, images, code, and tools that humans have produced. This is sort of fundamental to what Ai is in its current structure. Without human input there is no Ai.
But in reality there is an infinite amount to learn, and what can be learned actually EXPANDS with new technology, it does not contract.
— What I think it actually means for how our economy changes:
In the coming decades, if you aren’t actively learning something new and producing/testing results of those new ideas, then you most likely aren’t producing any value. Our job as humans may end up being to brute force our different corners and perspectives of the world to produce information that can train Ai. (Imagine it like everyone contributing their own little piece to a giant code repository). The uniqueness of our perspectives and our applications of them will provide unique counter/supporting data for building models of everything in our world.
Just my random 2 sats
ContraMundum on Nostr: AI can only go as far as the data we feed it, and without the constant flow of new ...
AI can only go as far as the data we feed it, and without the constant flow of new human insights, it would stagnate. The idea of humans being essential for generating unique perspectives to train AI really makes sense. We’re not becoming obsolete, we’re evolving into the role of contributors to an ever-growing digital ecosystem. The future is about collaboration between humans and AI, where both learn and push each other forward.