Event JSON
{
"id": "3cc6a598e2b4f7ba53c490a326a86731cc1e5f30215574d1eb05bac3615a9d72",
"pubkey": "3d08de8f500a2c14e62cb4baf0308166baec5fd96df4c58f999745ce4e7b3eac",
"created_at": 1724953810,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"22c06ca48386d8d19496a6e6ace352e23e6e8de63f223af3019e3d3e692e2797",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"973c779cb5e72ff0b6f0f47f8e86aee1face1c21b80ae0d9bc50968aa717e4b8",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"9b6e93cd1ef15a484a321cc2acee2f23c39f16c08d3f7e192f8ae2a05e57db9e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://indieweb.social/users/brettk/statuses/113046572894865992",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1ytqxefyrsmvdr9yk5mn2ec6juglxar0x8u3r4ucpnc7nu6fwy7tsyz9rrp Oh and here's their (yes, absolutely slanted!) coverage of the ruling: https://www.techdirt.com/2024/08/29/third-circuits-section-230-tiktok-ruling-deliberately-ignores-precedent-defies-logic/",
"sig": "877013245992f9f760cf3640d48c3c8d3b2f4aefa7197ff79475cb8e516fb99ccd1ac69db091e8fccfcd8304ffdc1057ed8392423fc658d0ab3a3078ac8e6068"
}