todmann67 on Nostr: I still maintain that if you possess it then you actually are fulfilling a component ...
I still maintain that if you possess it then you actually are fulfilling a component of a property rule entitlement. Bitcoiners ought to fight to keep our entitlement to bitcoins purely within the scope of a property rule, because everything thing outside that is a liability rule, and then we are stuck with liability money.
Published at
2024-02-21 17:16:48Event JSON
{
"id": "36cf5aeae5a641436c666fda9e92c542febeea981f0d25c23a7f1f735419d2f4",
"pubkey": "99c2d9dedcb5e15375fdf578515ae04e1d12dea736179aa2c13b4f8ac1433568",
"created_at": 1708535808,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"bc7d563bc09213f9cdd6dfdbbdb77924090a9fc7915a99402f5112ce88fcec3a"
],
[
"p",
"59fbee7369df7713dbbfa9bbdb0892c62eba929232615c6ff2787da384cb770f",
""
],
[
"p",
"652d58acafa105af8475c0fe8029a52e7ddbc337b2bd9c98bb17a111dc4cde60"
]
],
"content": "I still maintain that if you possess it then you actually are fulfilling a component of a property rule entitlement. Bitcoiners ought to fight to keep our entitlement to bitcoins purely within the scope of a property rule, because everything thing outside that is a liability rule, and then we are stuck with liability money.",
"sig": "609b44aa263d9e3f5269f8a8f57aa53a5d44538466a97d913b22a5f5a102fa337a29113182c9d00488cec634beb3e2a0223b0f626e7495cdb704dab4e83baa9e"
}
