tante on Nostr: I wrote a few days ago how the OSI's new "Open Source AI" definition is not open ...
Published at
2024-10-28 11:37:39Event JSON
{
"id": "36b7fd55389d37888521f5bc06eaae0a2bc3628cb6dd9733c6c1901c88a29f04",
"pubkey": "6e5bb3f4df765d024066fb8b1b0ab196b68726b8092782a387c9698fd05d8c35",
"created_at": 1730115459,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"d0da7ff50eba9559589c8b28ccded25ccdb1797e127982fd7043ea0084fe363d",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"6e8f8827ba165a021e13b7424eb1288258ff4050945f5752f1ce477f5a2cf134",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://tldr.nettime.org/users/tante/statuses/113384846743927151",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "I wrote a few days ago how the OSI's new \"Open Source AI\" definition is not open source (and that \"open source AI\" basically doesn't exist for larger systems) (https://tante.cc/2024/10/16/does-open-source-ai-really-exist/)\n\nNow OSI really wants to keep pushing it and now collects corporate endorsers for this hollow definition whose only job is to enable \"open washing\" of proprietary systems. And personally I find it deeply disturbing that nostr:npub16rd8lagwh224jkyu3v5vehkjtnxmz7t7zfuc9ltsg04qpp87xc7sfh3v3k, and SUSE Linux - who both should know better - supported this. The fact that Mozilla does is just the next step in their intellectual collapse. \n\nhttps://opensource.org/ai/endorsements",
"sig": "228c2a7368d6b214e5640789af347f6fbdc75c846a27a8080df9ff105de2fc8051a003388087c7d08d1aadf2512d255e6d7490f2db42cb96140ea8cfe123f29a"
}