📅 Original date posted:2011-07-02
🗒️ Summary of this message: A discussion about the use of autotools versus cmake as a build system for a project, with concerns raised about cmake not following the standard build procedure.
📝 Original message:On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Luke-Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> On Saturday, July 02, 2011 3:29:04 AM John Smith wrote:
> > Why again did we choose for autotools as future build system instead of
> > cmake?
>
> I don't really care much either way, but cmake doesn't follow the standard
> build procedure (./configure && make && make install), though I imagine
> ./configure could be emulated with some script.
>
It would change the sequence to
cmake . && make && make install
So a shell script named 'configure' that starts 'cmake .' is the most easy
case :-) Probably it'd also need to pass through some command line args, for
example --prefix.
JS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20110702/e5aef2ef/attachment.html>;
John Smith [ARCHIVE] /
npub1e4…4jafl
2023-06-07 02:01:27
in reply to nevent1q…ug0t
Author Public Key
npub1e4lupyw4vuuhfsmt726ud69555re66pph90kwx0afpt346e9k7zsd4jaflPublished at
2023-06-07 02:01:27Event JSON
{
"id": "33c0df142eba51e1b42a8ba71442620fc4aa6a222da44898bc8076e848ef956e",
"pubkey": "cd7fc091d5673974c36bf2b5c6e8b4a5079d6821b95f6719fd48571aeb25b785",
"created_at": 1686103287,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c539c8254db861f3128bdc955ff0ae63580df052380433f714ba3e35210d5867",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"5306c8de61c45a837a15300b42660dc2565d7004f6cfb4030992a161d0fa3bd8",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2011-07-02\n🗒️ Summary of this message: A discussion about the use of autotools versus cmake as a build system for a project, with concerns raised about cmake not following the standard build procedure.\n📝 Original message:On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Luke-Jr \u003cluke at dashjr.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Saturday, July 02, 2011 3:29:04 AM John Smith wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Why again did we choose for autotools as future build system instead of\n\u003e \u003e cmake?\n\u003e\n\u003e I don't really care much either way, but cmake doesn't follow the standard\n\u003e build procedure (./configure \u0026\u0026 make \u0026\u0026 make install), though I imagine\n\u003e ./configure could be emulated with some script.\n\u003e\n\nIt would change the sequence to\n\ncmake . \u0026\u0026 make \u0026\u0026 make install\n\nSo a shell script named 'configure' that starts 'cmake .' is the most easy\ncase :-) Probably it'd also need to pass through some command line args, for\nexample --prefix.\n\nJS\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20110702/e5aef2ef/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "8d463653009bd73167c0e552556c892f559db8867bb92b164d4cd9823c2aa4d59fa6ce4385d3cbdda44d8dac08de86c4ba620077159f48e28e5f470b17773ecb"
}