Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2011-07-02 🗒️ Summary of this message: John Smith ...
📅 Original date posted:2011-07-02
🗒️ Summary of this message: John Smith questions the decision to use autotools instead of cmake as the future build system, citing cmake's deviation from the standard build procedure.
📝 Original message:On Saturday, July 02, 2011 3:29:04 AM John Smith wrote:
> Why again did we choose for autotools as future build system instead of
> cmake?
I don't really care much either way, but cmake doesn't follow the standard
build procedure (./configure && make && make install), though I imagine
./configure could be emulated with some script.
Published at
2023-06-07 02:01:24Event JSON
{
"id": "5306c8de61c45a837a15300b42660dc2565d7004f6cfb4030992a161d0fa3bd8",
"pubkey": "6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1",
"created_at": 1686103284,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c539c8254db861f3128bdc955ff0ae63580df052380433f714ba3e35210d5867",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"fee54d1183b1345f5b6430b6d37743f48cd1f823ac398966fc1b4da34f3b14e6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"cd7fc091d5673974c36bf2b5c6e8b4a5079d6821b95f6719fd48571aeb25b785"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2011-07-02\n🗒️ Summary of this message: John Smith questions the decision to use autotools instead of cmake as the future build system, citing cmake's deviation from the standard build procedure.\n📝 Original message:On Saturday, July 02, 2011 3:29:04 AM John Smith wrote:\n\u003e Why again did we choose for autotools as future build system instead of\n\u003e cmake?\n\nI don't really care much either way, but cmake doesn't follow the standard \nbuild procedure (./configure \u0026\u0026 make \u0026\u0026 make install), though I imagine \n./configure could be emulated with some script.",
"sig": "b912fff6c820b8e6f46882fcfa460f9be0e70fa4d92d69016d0799a9b1c805d8e6132c62e615d25541284679771cb518ca7337176355184bae3d2244150463aa"
}