📅 Original date posted:2017-06-20
📝 Original message:> I think it would be useful for there to exist a useful and trivial
> patch against current (0.14.2) software to engage in the BIP91-like
> orphaning, like people have provided for BIP148-- but right now I
> don't see any specification of the behavior so it's unclear to me
> _exactly_ what it would need to implement to be consistent.
I agree.
This is the latest code regarding BIP91 that got merged,
https://github.com/btc1/bitcoin/pull/21/files so that should be the spec we
need to follow (also the old BIP91 PR:
https://github.com/btc1/bitcoin/pull/17/files).
Perhaps James Hilliard could give input here though.
2017-06-21 0:34 GMT+02:00 Gregory Maxwell <greg at xiph.org>:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Hampus Sjöberg
> <hampus.sjoberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Segwit2x/BIP91/BIP148 will orphan miners that do not run a Segwit2x (or
> > BIP148) node, because they wouldn't have the new consensus rule of
> requiring
> > all blocks to signal for segwit.
>
> All versions of Bitcoin Core since 0.13.1 signal segwit, 0.14.1+ even
> when downstream mining software doesn't support it.
>
> I think it would be useful for there to exist a useful and trivial
> patch against current (0.14.2) software to engage in the BIP91-like
> orphaning, like people have provided for BIP148-- but right now I
> don't see any specification of the behavior so it's unclear to me
> _exactly_ what it would need to implement to be consistent.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170621/d51a368b/attachment.html>;
Hampus Sjöberg [ARCHIVE] /
npub10u…hln8t
2023-06-07 18:03:33
in reply to nevent1q…r749
Author Public Key
npub10uzud4rf4636awmfgvarmcfndcmdnv8rfd2y3rx2sqgckv9zur4qahln8tPublished at
2023-06-07 18:03:33Event JSON
{
"id": "072e5beef32fe7843a4236519c0932e76cb63a0562b6d20059f5d3c0186af7f2",
"pubkey": "7f05c6d469aea3aebb69433a3de1336e36d9b0e34b54488cca80118b30a2e0ea",
"created_at": 1686161013,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f10d3c1837e5518719736f82b51f13e32ba605e8e3996b8db87dad10332b09a3",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d1b00fab22f260c316e0a6193f9ab547ea7a49cf79113946136db7031ea7e946",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-06-20\n📝 Original message:\u003e I think it would be useful for there to exist a useful and trivial\n\u003e patch against current (0.14.2) software to engage in the BIP91-like\n\u003e orphaning, like people have provided for BIP148-- but right now I\n\u003e don't see any specification of the behavior so it's unclear to me\n\u003e _exactly_ what it would need to implement to be consistent.\n\nI agree.\nThis is the latest code regarding BIP91 that got merged,\nhttps://github.com/btc1/bitcoin/pull/21/files so that should be the spec we\nneed to follow (also the old BIP91 PR:\nhttps://github.com/btc1/bitcoin/pull/17/files).\nPerhaps James Hilliard could give input here though.\n\n\n2017-06-21 0:34 GMT+02:00 Gregory Maxwell \u003cgreg at xiph.org\u003e:\n\n\u003e On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Hampus Sjöberg\n\u003e \u003champus.sjoberg at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Segwit2x/BIP91/BIP148 will orphan miners that do not run a Segwit2x (or\n\u003e \u003e BIP148) node, because they wouldn't have the new consensus rule of\n\u003e requiring\n\u003e \u003e all blocks to signal for segwit.\n\u003e\n\u003e All versions of Bitcoin Core since 0.13.1 signal segwit, 0.14.1+ even\n\u003e when downstream mining software doesn't support it.\n\u003e\n\u003e I think it would be useful for there to exist a useful and trivial\n\u003e patch against current (0.14.2) software to engage in the BIP91-like\n\u003e orphaning, like people have provided for BIP148-- but right now I\n\u003e don't see any specification of the behavior so it's unclear to me\n\u003e _exactly_ what it would need to implement to be consistent.\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170621/d51a368b/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "b8c466b431c8b2b1dfef66c1d484eeded9a5030f0367851aa859dde4dc942dfec53523bc32345eb25b43683bc36872bf0d404a87cb33658b2f84cf5a5510b884"
}