📅 Original date posted:2017-06-20
📝 Original message:On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Hampus Sjöberg
<hampus.sjoberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Segwit2x/BIP91/BIP148 will orphan miners that do not run a Segwit2x (or
> BIP148) node, because they wouldn't have the new consensus rule of requiring
> all blocks to signal for segwit.
All versions of Bitcoin Core since 0.13.1 signal segwit, 0.14.1+ even
when downstream mining software doesn't support it.
I think it would be useful for there to exist a useful and trivial
patch against current (0.14.2) software to engage in the BIP91-like
orphaning, like people have provided for BIP148-- but right now I
don't see any specification of the behavior so it's unclear to me
_exactly_ what it would need to implement to be consistent.
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 18:03:33
in reply to nevent1q…7awj
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetPublished at
2023-06-07 18:03:33Event JSON
{
"id": "d1b00fab22f260c316e0a6193f9ab547ea7a49cf79113946136db7031ea7e946",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686161013,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f10d3c1837e5518719736f82b51f13e32ba605e8e3996b8db87dad10332b09a3",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0a0153479712dd1d6b132996b64d457e4f5f569a5a3880137bbd363b41414e55",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"22944ce1e29904e3826d25013a614e4665693ec514003efacc1b7586e8e5d0aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-06-20\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Hampus Sjöberg\n\u003champus.sjoberg at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Segwit2x/BIP91/BIP148 will orphan miners that do not run a Segwit2x (or\n\u003e BIP148) node, because they wouldn't have the new consensus rule of requiring\n\u003e all blocks to signal for segwit.\n\nAll versions of Bitcoin Core since 0.13.1 signal segwit, 0.14.1+ even\nwhen downstream mining software doesn't support it.\n\nI think it would be useful for there to exist a useful and trivial\npatch against current (0.14.2) software to engage in the BIP91-like\norphaning, like people have provided for BIP148-- but right now I\ndon't see any specification of the behavior so it's unclear to me\n_exactly_ what it would need to implement to be consistent.",
"sig": "25c1fbea04fd41e8bcaa4d6c6b890113c2344db62c5a6d1525157910b19e433e8db97f95eb73fca532e066c7532e9330a7afa607c0cb171c158a9085002eddfc"
}