Thank you for your response. I knew I would learn something from the answer.
The first part with how to phrase it so a contentmoderation bot can be feeded the relays data but not an external model can be legally difficult I understand. And I am happy, when you are willing to train a model to help with content moderation in a moral mannar.
And I think as I read the terms of use in Mastodon, it is not about how to enforce it on others or if other relays work at the same respect. When there is a market of "terms of service" so users can choose between different relays to directly upload their notes, I think this already has value.
It is clear, that someone can populate the note to a relay with conflicting terms of service. By the nature of Nostr this is not to be prevented.
Maby there could also be a way, that users can set a flat "my notes are free to be used for training language models". So when enough clients implement this flag, training could be applied in an opt-in manner, which would be morally advanced.
hodlbod (nprofile…u0w6) or Vitor Pamplona (nprofile…pt5w) is there already something similar available in an existing NIP?
freemymind 🇨ðŸ‡
npub1kl…0u2uq
2025-06-17 15:46:18
in reply to nevent1q…pd6n
Author Public Key
npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uqPublished at
2025-06-17 15:46:18Event JSON
{
"id": "000009670bf19a6c00d70f529d7a723e750c03210d5dc312eff80641e72488f1",
"pubkey": "b7cf9f42a796b091e843dce919d3ef4c0dc82e029452edf0bdbcdeb9ecb93e78",
"created_at": 1750175178,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"97c70a44366a6535c145b333f973ea86dfdc2d7a99da618c40c64705ad98e322",
""
],
[
"p",
"460c25e682fda7832b52d1f22d3d22b3176d972f60dcdc3212ed8c92ef85065c",
""
],
[
"p",
"52b4a076bcbbbdc3a1aefa3735816cf74993b1b8db202b01c883c58be7fad8bd",
"",
"semisol"
],
[
"p",
"cab4d11105b869f4092570c21beb8689cf521b73a502da8cc21d3269e69a4c09",
"",
"Den Yellek"
],
[
"e",
"00003080a4989d4bee06fe28d913d5141f12508031b71ddcbd84870b3b679c9b",
"wss://relay.primal.net/",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"000011aab400bcb9958e751e8eb967033f05e849269826e63f450054ce52876b",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"e",
"f4e1c57f8ec5652946f99d9ff6f58593332454803c46248264181f3b4c501686",
"",
"reply",
"52b4a076bcbbbdc3a1aefa3735816cf74993b1b8db202b01c883c58be7fad8bd"
],
[
"client",
"Coracle",
"31990:97c70a44366a6535c145b333f973ea86dfdc2d7a99da618c40c64705ad98e322:1685968093690"
],
[
"nonce",
"339618",
"18"
]
],
"content": "Thank you for your response. I knew I would learn something from the answer.\nThe first part with how to phrase it so a contentmoderation bot can be feeded the relays data but not an external model can be legally difficult I understand. And I am happy, when you are willing to train a model to help with content moderation in a moral mannar.\n\nAnd I think as I read the terms of use in Mastodon, it is not about how to enforce it on others or if other relays work at the same respect. When there is a market of \"terms of service\" so users can choose between different relays to directly upload their notes, I think this already has value.\n\nIt is clear, that someone can populate the note to a relay with conflicting terms of service. By the nature of Nostr this is not to be prevented. \n\nMaby there could also be a way, that users can set a flat \"my notes are free to be used for training language models\". So when enough clients implement this flag, training could be applied in an opt-in manner, which would be morally advanced.\nnostr:nprofile1qqsf03c2gsmx5ef4c9zmxvlew04gdh7u94afnknp33qvv3c94kvwxgsm3u0w6 or nostr:nprofile1qqsyvrp9u6p0mfur9dfdru3d853tx9mdjuhkphxuxgfwmryja7zsvhqelpt5w is there already something similar available in an existing NIP?",
"sig": "6af5e2b348e26c812b60658460f212d2d312bf92a4998be8f4957f85ac506febdd42fce7f2d6d0f351ce72506fbc3fb2661d17eae38de9e5adb5b335c3780871"
}