LogicallyMinded on Nostr: Interesting take on the #OP_RETURN debate. After watching this video, I’d like to ...
Interesting take on the #OP_RETURN debate.
After watching this video, I’d like to know what are the arguments of the proponents for removing the OP_RETURN limit on using rules to filter non-financial data as an alternative solution?
It seems to me that non-financial data is an issue in itself for which #Bitcoin wasn’t purpose built in the first place. They should be considered as spam. If the only good technical solution is to filter those data then so be it. That doesn’t prevent those who disagree to run software that doesn’t filter this data.
#BTC
https://youtu.be/15biQH1H140?feature=sharedPublished at
2025-05-02 03:04:38Event JSON
{
"id": "0961db1e1460a4058575ba909d2017d54b7e84c578828b66193a64272fcb3789",
"pubkey": "83d302b5c25ed43e5b75532fa6a6bda21c4b63e9f516826798f516fc4159b9c7",
"created_at": 1746155078,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"op_return"
],
[
"t",
"bitcoin"
],
[
"t",
"btc"
],
[
"r",
"https://youtu.be/15biQH1H140?feature=shared"
]
],
"content": "Interesting take on the #OP_RETURN debate. \n\nAfter watching this video, I’d like to know what are the arguments of the proponents for removing the OP_RETURN limit on using rules to filter non-financial data as an alternative solution? \n\nIt seems to me that non-financial data is an issue in itself for which #Bitcoin wasn’t purpose built in the first place. They should be considered as spam. If the only good technical solution is to filter those data then so be it. That doesn’t prevent those who disagree to run software that doesn’t filter this data. \n\n#BTC\n\nhttps://youtu.be/15biQH1H140?feature=shared",
"sig": "b1e9a2a42792f6d5d9224a798ebd6b3e6e171c5f5a870ab31fb2fd2c7a1e8c01d1889de92d4b362acc6792eb0a6a5e780bcc7187bb7c3f02d5b0f284c749c0ae"
}