Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2024-02-29 11:45:56
in reply to

freeborn | ἐλεύθερος on Nostr: I can agree with Deut. 29:29. Just because a mystery can be articulated in doctrinal ...

I can agree with Deut. 29:29. Just because a mystery can be articulated in doctrinal propositions does not mean it is `comprehensible` in the technical sense. I'll stick with the Reformers, and the Post-Reformation fathers, like Owen. I'm not particularly interested in reviving the Clark-Van Til controversy over social media. Van Til was right: analogical knowledge does not shut us up to skepticism (per Clark) and it also does not claim univocicity (which would be to claim infinity for a created mind). Thanks for the engagement.
Author Public Key
npub1ak5kewf6anwkrt0qc8ua907ljkn7wm83e2ycyrpcumjvaf2upszs8r0gwg