Caleb James DeLisle on Nostr: OK so here's the thing. the problem with Racial Competition as a model is that it's ...
OK so here's the thing. the problem with Racial Competition as a model is that it's really inefficient.
Firstly, it's prone to freeloaders:
One example of freeloaders is half-breeds who play whichever race is most convenient for them at the time. For example the "My fellow white people, you can do better" trope.
Now you might imagine that you can just exclude everyone who isn't a true blue pureblood because they're not *really* white, and then you exclude all Jews because no matter how white they are, you just deem them non-white. But you have NOT solved the problem.
You still have 100% true blue whites who are acting very much against the interests of white people as a group - Washington DC is full of them.
There is no answer for these people, because there's no biological way to differentiate them from what you consider to be "the white race".
The second problem is allies:
In race-based criminal gangs, it's not uncommon to have one "honorary Italian" or "honorary Irish", etc. These people are given status because they have something the group needs. Nobody can really say WHY they have that status, except "boss says so" or "always been that way".
If you're trying to build a White Nation, you're going to run into these inconsistencies and unless you have a "boss" to "say so", it will always be a problem.
Here's a simple question, who is your preferred statesman: Clarence Thomas, or Joe Biden? A strict White Nationalist will have difficulty with this question.
---
With modern technology, social credit is WILDLY more efficient at building a Nation than simple race. With social credit, there's no real way to freeload because you'll lose your (individual) credit and end up on the outside. Conversely, there's nothing preventing allies of the group from becoming part of the group by making value, becoming invested, and gaining social credit as a result.
The challenge is of course "anchoring" the social credit. It's easy to make a web-of-trust, but you need to identify a trust anchor which represents "the good of the Nation" so that the web converts into everyone having an actual number.
This is still young research, but I'm confident it CAN be done, and when it's done it will be the apex predator of human organizations.
Published at
2024-10-05 21:22:31Event JSON
{
"id": "0a4e91afad15a02d689256617d18de92ba9fe48fbb3dc8e65563a7b1d9ea9ddb",
"pubkey": "dde9dd6efbaf3c747c06bfd60f732666acd686e4c2eff471937f0c7c5fca5e0e",
"created_at": 1728163351,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"dde9dd6efbaf3c747c06bfd60f732666acd686e4c2eff471937f0c7c5fca5e0e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"04113dba0bbbf29fc0c7197469a5add07c6ea08def9fb6d45863e026b3c3221e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://pkteerium.xyz/objects/e74689a8-b39f-4b65-87d4-413fe3ece426",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "OK so here's the thing. the problem with Racial Competition as a model is that it's really inefficient.\n\nFirstly, it's prone to freeloaders:\n\nOne example of freeloaders is half-breeds who play whichever race is most convenient for them at the time. For example the \"My fellow white people, you can do better\" trope.\n\nNow you might imagine that you can just exclude everyone who isn't a true blue pureblood because they're not *really* white, and then you exclude all Jews because no matter how white they are, you just deem them non-white. But you have NOT solved the problem.\n\nYou still have 100% true blue whites who are acting very much against the interests of white people as a group - Washington DC is full of them.\n\nThere is no answer for these people, because there's no biological way to differentiate them from what you consider to be \"the white race\".\n\nThe second problem is allies:\n\nIn race-based criminal gangs, it's not uncommon to have one \"honorary Italian\" or \"honorary Irish\", etc. These people are given status because they have something the group needs. Nobody can really say WHY they have that status, except \"boss says so\" or \"always been that way\".\n\nIf you're trying to build a White Nation, you're going to run into these inconsistencies and unless you have a \"boss\" to \"say so\", it will always be a problem.\n\nHere's a simple question, who is your preferred statesman: Clarence Thomas, or Joe Biden? A strict White Nationalist will have difficulty with this question.\n\n---\n\nWith modern technology, social credit is WILDLY more efficient at building a Nation than simple race. With social credit, there's no real way to freeload because you'll lose your (individual) credit and end up on the outside. Conversely, there's nothing preventing allies of the group from becoming part of the group by making value, becoming invested, and gaining social credit as a result.\n\nThe challenge is of course \"anchoring\" the social credit. It's easy to make a web-of-trust, but you need to identify a trust anchor which represents \"the good of the Nation\" so that the web converts into everyone having an actual number.\n\nThis is still young research, but I'm confident it CAN be done, and when it's done it will be the apex predator of human organizations.",
"sig": "43cb52eebe20288086b3e845c8e9eb6042907f3e00b863510fc054ed7d979533104b707b75e919d39f0f4f43cbd46cb55b2ff3e67125549a47d64a66e5525385"
}