npub1ary93kr00e2m3zwpf4c5mgyctsr0sr80p07aw6xgcc4pw2v2md8qe5md4c (npub1ary…md4c) npub1qe8g6jawrenqxgs2e6vlwc2m4u9xtj8qa0vhv9n3f9dzlh36yjcs804vky (npub1qe8…4vky)
That's a good point, npub1ary93kr00e2m3zwpf4c5mgyctsr0sr80p07aw6xgcc4pw2v2md8qe5md4c (npub1ary…md4c)! We need to continuously ask ourselves: where have we been and where are we headed and are we stuck?
I think the important route out of the local minimum is indeed pluralism (as many have said). Our colleagues might pursue the same questions as us but via very different approaches and when it comes to "who knows?", we need to respect the importance of that happening.
For instance, several have argued that the intensive focus on amyloid in Alzheimer's at the cost of other possible causes may have been a mistake (that's still TBD).
If we can maintain pluralism, it minimizes the chances of our getting stuck. So we shouldn't all jump on those bandwagons (and our funding agencies need to recognize the value of a distributed portfolio too).
Nicole Rust /
npub1cu…0zuw2
2023-09-10 20:14:57
in reply to nevent1q…v994
Author Public Key
npub1cud99prgj4etl597aaxthxenrcjmfxl92dgj8snf9a9p8ctupfyq80zuw2Published at
2023-09-10 20:14:57Event JSON
{
"id": "1109f58efcdf268a1d0fa25d7f9027780f2cca928805bff082f36fb103bc796d",
"pubkey": "c71a5284689572bfd0beef4cbb9b331e25b49be5535123c2692f4a13e17c0a48",
"created_at": 1694376897,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e8c858d86f7e55b889c14d714da0985c06f80cef0bfdd768c8c62a17298adb4e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"064e8d4bae1e6603220ace99f7615baf0a65c8e0ebd9761671495a2fde3a24b1",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"aea6da747809495d3d20f8abb0da37bdf92c36213a03f3ec24783d90cc94aaa1",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"1a47cc6ca598d4efbaa215ea3282acf01a52558585876c9b1326a0888a137c43",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"78c4986f51123c7a541cf1944d0dedb44a429213c5f25adecaf4a2fd5eb8dccb",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://neuromatch.social/users/NicoleCRust/statuses/111042684338171699",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1ary93kr00e2m3zwpf4c5mgyctsr0sr80p07aw6xgcc4pw2v2md8qe5md4c nostr:npub1qe8g6jawrenqxgs2e6vlwc2m4u9xtj8qa0vhv9n3f9dzlh36yjcs804vky \n\nThat's a good point, nostr:npub1ary93kr00e2m3zwpf4c5mgyctsr0sr80p07aw6xgcc4pw2v2md8qe5md4c! We need to continuously ask ourselves: where have we been and where are we headed and are we stuck? \n\nI think the important route out of the local minimum is indeed pluralism (as many have said). Our colleagues might pursue the same questions as us but via very different approaches and when it comes to \"who knows?\", we need to respect the importance of that happening.\n\nFor instance, several have argued that the intensive focus on amyloid in Alzheimer's at the cost of other possible causes may have been a mistake (that's still TBD).\n\nIf we can maintain pluralism, it minimizes the chances of our getting stuck. So we shouldn't all jump on those bandwagons (and our funding agencies need to recognize the value of a distributed portfolio too).",
"sig": "1be13651e7ffc2b11d5c8e5177d77728aa158b4b4e45b3190929c04ea881d1691e01711b770e03026b3da4e434914c15d17537ffa958db109301b664de442842"
}