Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2024-11-05 18:36:52

bostonwine on Nostr: Long read, philosophers welcome, tl;dr-seekers beware šŸ˜‰ Iā€™ve been thinking ...

Long read, philosophers welcome, tl;dr-seekers beware šŸ˜‰


Iā€™ve been thinking deeply today about the concept of action: of freely manifesting the next instance of reality. This concept takes many forms, but today Iā€™m looking at it in the context of speech and Bitcoin/cryptographic sovereigntyā€¦



*Running your own node fulfills the direct peer-to-peer nature of Bitcoinā€™s original state*


So. Itā€™s easy to understand the practical case for running a Bitcoin node, with benefits like the ability to verify your coins and improved privacy.

But thereā€™s also a philosophical consideration that Iā€™ve been mulling overā€¦ and Iā€™d love othersā€™ input.

When running a node, you not only verify and sign transactions; you also broadcast them to the network, where another node (peer) can pick up the electrons (loosely described).

If you use your wallet providerā€™s node, you depend on them to communicate your desired transaction with your trade partner. By using another entityā€™s node, you sacrifice the pure peer-to-peer nature of the Bitcoin network.

Likewise, by running your own node and freely broadcasting your own transaction to your peer, you take full control of (and responsibility for) your action and its effect.

This isnā€™t to suggest that ā€œyou must run node to be good bitcoinerā€ or some nonsense like that (although itā€™s self-evident that running a node is usually good). Most of us still depend on internet and electric companies to achieve any of this stuff.

Iā€™m moreso contemplating different setups and permutations of sovereignty.

Thereā€™s something beautiful about the process of communicating your intended transfer of value on your own terms, permission-less-ly, rather than asking a service provider to communicate it for you.

So, Iā€™m coming to view it more as an expression of the principle of freedom of speech.

We know the code-is-speech case, but thatā€™s a little different. As I understand it, it means that freedom of expression includes the math and language of code, such that code is included among in the types of speech to which we have a right.

On the other hand, Iā€™m thinking about the moment of broadcasting a transaction from your own node.

Taking this action is exercising the freedom *to* speak, to express your intention of transferring value.

To broadcast a Bitcoin transaction, from your own node, is to declare your participation in this global network of near-perfect consensus.

I canā€™t quite put my finger on it, but there is something profound about that moment of action, of doing, of ā€œis-nessā€, of the truth and reality of manifesting action in the present moment.

Of course, grokking this profound experience is not constrained to Bitcoin transactions ā€” the beauty of being/doing exists everywhere ā€” but Iā€™m struck today by the freeness of action, and how that action is itself an expression of the right to speak and to assemble.

Thereā€™s something exceptional about action - generation, manifestation, creation. When the freedom to speak is overlaid on the significance of action, then the choice to run your own node, and to broadcast your transaction directly to the network of your peers takes on a deeper significance and value.

Thanks for reading šŸ«‚šŸ§”

#plebchain #showerthoughts #grownostr #philosophy
Author Public Key
npub14qz92uedt0a8jte8jqg63jr3s5cc99cej36jh883z6tprlu354uqqe2q26