bostonwine on Nostr: Long read, philosophers welcome, tl;dr-seekers beware š Iāve been thinking ...
Long read, philosophers welcome, tl;dr-seekers beware š
Iāve been thinking deeply today about the concept of action: of freely manifesting the next instance of reality. This concept takes many forms, but today Iām looking at it in the context of speech and Bitcoin/cryptographic sovereigntyā¦
*Running your own node fulfills the direct peer-to-peer nature of Bitcoinās original state*
So. Itās easy to understand the practical case for running a Bitcoin node, with benefits like the ability to verify your coins and improved privacy.
But thereās also a philosophical consideration that Iāve been mulling overā¦ and Iād love othersā input.
When running a node, you not only verify and sign transactions; you also broadcast them to the network, where another node (peer) can pick up the electrons (loosely described).
If you use your wallet providerās node, you depend on them to communicate your desired transaction with your trade partner. By using another entityās node, you sacrifice the pure peer-to-peer nature of the Bitcoin network.
Likewise, by running your own node and freely broadcasting your own transaction to your peer, you take full control of (and responsibility for) your action and its effect.
This isnāt to suggest that āyou must run node to be good bitcoinerā or some nonsense like that (although itās self-evident that running a node is usually good). Most of us still depend on internet and electric companies to achieve any of this stuff.
Iām moreso contemplating different setups and permutations of sovereignty.
Thereās something beautiful about the process of communicating your intended transfer of value on your own terms, permission-less-ly, rather than asking a service provider to communicate it for you.
So, Iām coming to view it more as an expression of the principle of freedom of speech.
We know the code-is-speech case, but thatās a little different. As I understand it, it means that freedom of expression includes the math and language of code, such that code is included among in the types of speech to which we have a right.
On the other hand, Iām thinking about the moment of broadcasting a transaction from your own node.
Taking this action is exercising the freedom *to* speak, to express your intention of transferring value.
To broadcast a Bitcoin transaction, from your own node, is to declare your participation in this global network of near-perfect consensus.
I canāt quite put my finger on it, but there is something profound about that moment of action, of doing, of āis-nessā, of the truth and reality of manifesting action in the present moment.
Of course, grokking this profound experience is not constrained to Bitcoin transactions ā the beauty of being/doing exists everywhere ā but Iām struck today by the freeness of action, and how that action is itself an expression of the right to speak and to assemble.
Thereās something exceptional about action - generation, manifestation, creation. When the freedom to speak is overlaid on the significance of action, then the choice to run your own node, and to broadcast your transaction directly to the network of your peers takes on a deeper significance and value.
Thanks for reading š«š§”
#plebchain #showerthoughts #grownostr #philosophy
Published at
2024-11-05 18:36:52Event JSON
{
"id": "122342965e5c1509b7e540f614b4d41f4485be2d7157d36685e989be5e7be117",
"pubkey": "a80455732d5bfa792f279011a8c871853182971994752b9cf1169611ff91a578",
"created_at": 1730831812,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"plebchain"
],
[
"t",
"showerthoughts"
],
[
"t",
"grownostr"
],
[
"t",
"philosophy"
]
],
"content": "Long read, philosophers welcome, tl;dr-seekers beware š\n\n\nIāve been thinking deeply today about the concept of action: of freely manifesting the next instance of reality. This concept takes many forms, but today Iām looking at it in the context of speech and Bitcoin/cryptographic sovereigntyā¦\n\n\n\n*Running your own node fulfills the direct peer-to-peer nature of Bitcoinās original state* \n\n\nSo. Itās easy to understand the practical case for running a Bitcoin node, with benefits like the ability to verify your coins and improved privacy.\n\nBut thereās also a philosophical consideration that Iāve been mulling overā¦ and Iād love othersā input.\n\nWhen running a node, you not only verify and sign transactions; you also broadcast them to the network, where another node (peer) can pick up the electrons (loosely described). \n\nIf you use your wallet providerās node, you depend on them to communicate your desired transaction with your trade partner. By using another entityās node, you sacrifice the pure peer-to-peer nature of the Bitcoin network.\n\nLikewise, by running your own node and freely broadcasting your own transaction to your peer, you take full control of (and responsibility for) your action and its effect. \n\nThis isnāt to suggest that āyou must run node to be good bitcoinerā or some nonsense like that (although itās self-evident that running a node is usually good). Most of us still depend on internet and electric companies to achieve any of this stuff.\n\nIām moreso contemplating different setups and permutations of sovereignty.\n\nThereās something beautiful about the process of communicating your intended transfer of value on your own terms, permission-less-ly, rather than asking a service provider to communicate it for you.\n\nSo, Iām coming to view it more as an expression of the principle of freedom of speech. \n\nWe know the code-is-speech case, but thatās a little different. As I understand it, it means that freedom of expression includes the math and language of code, such that code is included among in the types of speech to which we have a right.\n\nOn the other hand, Iām thinking about the moment of broadcasting a transaction from your own node. \n\nTaking this action is exercising the freedom *to* speak, to express your intention of transferring value.\n\nTo broadcast a Bitcoin transaction, from your own node, is to declare your participation in this global network of near-perfect consensus. \n\nI canāt quite put my finger on it, but there is something profound about that moment of action, of doing, of āis-nessā, of the truth and reality of manifesting action in the present moment.\n\nOf course, grokking this profound experience is not constrained to Bitcoin transactions ā the beauty of being/doing exists everywhere ā but Iām struck today by the freeness of action, and how that action is itself an expression of the right to speak and to assemble.\n\nThereās something exceptional about action - generation, manifestation, creation. When the freedom to speak is overlaid on the significance of action, then the choice to run your own node, and to broadcast your transaction directly to the network of your peers takes on a deeper significance and value.\n\nThanks for reading š«š§” \n\n#plebchain #showerthoughts #grownostr #philosophy",
"sig": "5a9629a9a8f5ad02335ab479f75463e4464ba6030736dc8f803a5bac0867cd50396f616a40cf2377b3db299af00928f8b01955e4ea60126aabf6732dc91d6fd4"
}