Please don't say "it's just life, it's not equal". I have never made any moral statement saying it was bad. I don't mind being told I'm wrong and I might be but you guys keeps on attributing moral statements to me such as being "unfair". I never said that and it is irritating me.
All I am saying is that some professions benefit more from a large starting capital than others. This shouldn't be controversial at all. We might disagree on the semantic of calling it Proof-Of-Stake but it is true that some professions benefit or even require more capital than others.
Again, I am not saying this is unfair or that it should change. I am simply stating the fact of the matter.
A leatherworker who starts with a big workshop and all the best tools will obtain better results and much faster than someone working on a small table with bad tools. On the other hand, if 2 people starts painting and one does it with the best brushes on earth, the best canvas, a big house and all his time he will not immediately reach better result than someone who simply has his time and some random brushes from dollorama.
I am simply saying that the result you obtain from leathercraft is more deeply tied to you initial capital than painting is. And that is the case for many professions. All have a different level. That dosen't mean that one is less good than an other. Just that one is a better proof of work than the other.
Do you disagree with this last statement? I don't understanding how this could be controversial.
Leathermint
npub1v0…m3m3e
2025-04-01 16:12:43
in reply to nevent1q…mlqc
Author Public Key
npub1v0tfjv5ahr3c260jtzdk5w48krerrnkg8fmcnc5lpguk0qda04eqzm3m3ePublished at
2025-04-01 16:12:43Event JSON
{
"id": "15f9fbadfbb1a6b461653da1be709fe6a5ccf8f27688282fd49ffda2ca758fd5",
"pubkey": "63d699329db8e38569f2589b6a3aa7b0f231cec83a7789e29f0a396781bd7d72",
"created_at": 1743523963,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8dc667bba509bd35e96d622f12449712870161e1612e248c0e1bfed846120944",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d3da6adb42b37bfdd847630b5a6df6b6d048ffd0eefc2b742738ab6322f08115",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"63d699329db8e38569f2589b6a3aa7b0f231cec83a7789e29f0a396781bd7d72"
],
[
"p",
"16f1a0100d4cfffbcc4230e8e0e4290cc5849c1adc64d6653fda07c031b1074b"
]
],
"content": "Please don't say \"it's just life, it's not equal\". I have never made any moral statement saying it was bad. I don't mind being told I'm wrong and I might be but you guys keeps on attributing moral statements to me such as being \"unfair\". I never said that and it is irritating me.\n\nAll I am saying is that some professions benefit more from a large starting capital than others. This shouldn't be controversial at all. We might disagree on the semantic of calling it Proof-Of-Stake but it is true that some professions benefit or even require more capital than others.\n\nAgain, I am not saying this is unfair or that it should change. I am simply stating the fact of the matter.\n\nA leatherworker who starts with a big workshop and all the best tools will obtain better results and much faster than someone working on a small table with bad tools. On the other hand, if 2 people starts painting and one does it with the best brushes on earth, the best canvas, a big house and all his time he will not immediately reach better result than someone who simply has his time and some random brushes from dollorama.\n\nI am simply saying that the result you obtain from leathercraft is more deeply tied to you initial capital than painting is. And that is the case for many professions. All have a different level. That dosen't mean that one is less good than an other. Just that one is a better proof of work than the other.\n\nDo you disagree with this last statement? I don't understanding how this could be controversial.",
"sig": "a3b605ccd32a8c4ce21cb11b46f0fdc2aab40756a2a6f50230ff7b4b1ec9e8d5cf9a35544c34f83b3332a491d12b5ee38adfbe68ceb8f8bc718a90576e9fc0d9"
}