"But the justices were not willing to rule that the 2nd Amendment protects the rights of dangerous people who have threatened others. 'An individual found by a court to pose a credible threat to the physical safety of another may be temporarily disarmed consistent with the 2nd Amendment,' the chief justice said. Equally important, seven other justices were willing to sign on to his opinion."
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2024-06-21/supreme-court-gun-rights-domestic-violence
#USPol #GunControl
Anirvan Chatterjee /
npub12g…vvnl7
2024-06-22 00:00:00
Author Public Key
npub12gc59ah4j7mwwkyy5d74y9z5a8h897zk45egpq4lt6vkrh8yacxskvvnl7Published at
2024-06-22 00:00:00Event JSON
{
"id": "19a20e647ad80d8fe5cd0a963202a39ea8590e6c372e666df7deb7858ce166a8",
"pubkey": "523142f6f597b6e75884a37d521454e9ee72f856ad328082bf5e9961dce4ee0d",
"created_at": 1719014400,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"uspol"
],
[
"t",
"guncontrol"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/anirvan/statuses/112657327782302290",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "\"But the justices were not willing to rule that the 2nd Amendment protects the rights of dangerous people who have threatened others. 'An individual found by a court to pose a credible threat to the physical safety of another may be temporarily disarmed consistent with the 2nd Amendment,' the chief justice said. Equally important, seven other justices were willing to sign on to his opinion.\"\n\nhttps://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2024-06-21/supreme-court-gun-rights-domestic-violence\n\n#USPol #GunControl",
"sig": "26f99bf5b9092a6e6f14eb1d5431004f75794d57a7952485b48268b99ecf650ef8c0e60befc5bf93008da28036e64b7a2634733880b4fd0ece0938201dd32137"
}