> My point is that NO one should EVER lose ANY money from a custodial system. Not a single sat. Regardless of how new things are.
I don't understand what you mean here. Is it "No bugs should cost normies money" or "There should be recourse for people running mints and then just walking away with the funds" or "Nobody should use custodial services as they are inherently bound to lose at least some of them money"?
LeoWandersleb / Leo Wandersleb
npub1gm…78rf6
2024-12-15 16:23:25
in reply to nevent1q…ftyt
Author Public Key
npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6Published at
2024-12-15 16:23:25Event JSON
{
"id": "140623d532f1701a97851e40849a319f9b9e59d92191b894138ef866f01b248f",
"pubkey": "46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d",
"created_at": 1734279805,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7ff98444c2817916e3b422978034d4fababec26cd30dce5a19faa6e4c0806a0b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"8ff1f794538d9caaf167aebce406631479995e1564a5d7041bfd3a82734eeb34",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"460c25e682fda7832b52d1f22d3d22b3176d972f60dcdc3212ed8c92ef85065c",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "\u003e My point is that NO one should EVER lose ANY money from a custodial system. Not a single sat. Regardless of how new things are.\n\nI don't understand what you mean here. Is it \"No bugs should cost normies money\" or \"There should be recourse for people running mints and then just walking away with the funds\" or \"Nobody should use custodial services as they are inherently bound to lose at least some of them money\"?",
"sig": "a98cd6f9b34cda6b6e8ee642505d516ebe5c17b96778c6635f15e4991d5e2fcdc7a12f35689977fff6250a96aecbc7a6c7159f1c7f57bb01fc1bcea960d54e83"
}