Chris Jolly Holcomb on Nostr: npub1zdp33…2vqv8 the meat alternatives simply being available always reminds me of ...

npub1zdp33shl69xr0uq3x8n5gsjykq9upycwh6nqm02c3f6x0frrn0dq42vqv8 (npub1zdp…vqv8) the meat alternatives simply being available always reminds me of an article a straight-edge friend of mine posted about why people get angry at those who don't drink. The basic premise is there's an implied moral decision, e.g. eat meat or have a drink, and folks have justified their choices to themselves. When someone takes the arguably more moral choice it's seen as an indictment of the seemingly less moral choice. When in many cases the choice is preferential rather than moral.