Event JSON
{
"id": "830f1279e90edbbab6453c4366d6bb136c75570ce0b102aa29845454babee71d",
"pubkey": "726a1e261cc6474674e8285e3951b3bb139be9a773d1acf49dc868db861a1c11",
"created_at": 1728656206,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ebba38aff4f5e02c614bcfd3daed805dc44ebdf305bdf0ff17c058ed3b33df72",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ebba38aff4f5e02c614bcfd3daed805dc44ebdf305bdf0ff17c058ed3b33df72",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"460c25e682fda7832b52d1f22d3d22b3176d972f60dcdc3212ed8c92ef85065c",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"f683e87035f7ad4f44e0b98cfbd9537e16455a92cd38cefc4cb31db7557f5ef2",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "While this is definitely needed, I have my doubts about cramping everything into one kind. Are we going to make that table huge?\n\nFor example, nostr:npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6 wants to position himself as a reproduceable attestation service provider. He's drafted an event for this response which would be too complicated for inclusion here.\n\nSame for WoT, it is a contentious topic and I'm not even sure what 0-100 means. The response would likely require more data than an integer. nostr:npub176p7sup477k5738qhxx0hk2n0cty2k5je5uvalzvkvwmw4tltmeqw7vgup \n\nSomething like the DVM NIP that uses sub-kinds might be more useful.",
"sig": "842d973068ecc8731a444e0432d75244f32045296e070d2e58768249d8bf2cb02cb45ddcf2653ab7fbdbcaa7d297a14f4aaceb6b21a91b95c4a5b6ea5ceeafd6"
}