I’ve mentioned on numerous occasions to Loded-Diaper (npub1ang…vfxh) that the material itself is not abuse but has the potential to produce new abusers by encouraging the development of paraphilias.
Do I think Lolicon should be made illegal?
Yes.
Should Lolicon be regarded the same as actual CSAM material?
No.
If you want to draw Lolicon as part of ‘muh freedom of expression‘ then you’re free to do that, doesn’t make you any less of a weirdo, but I draw the line at the distribution of it. Do you think it’s just a coincidence that there happens to be a lot of beastiality amongst furries?
It’s because their paraphilia has been enabled through their unfettered access to material portraying the abuse of animals or those sharing their likeness. There is a direct correlation between that and beastality and Lolicon and paedophilia which is why I don’t believe that Lolicon should be made legal or allowed to be distributed.
I’ve hinted on a couple of occasions that I’m a libertarian, and as a Libertarian, you can imagine I’m adverse to the notion of a government with overreaching authority.
But that is one of the few exceptions I’m willing to make to ensure a safer future for our childhood, one in which they aren’t subject to the same things you were.
Eòlach /
npub1kp…8ntnt
2023-10-01 23:34:45
in reply to nevent1q…9y7y
Author Public Key
npub1kps389j3dny4hfsjp785tk775290wsg836c0lfq5tmhcv54c6vgsr8ntntPublished at
2023-10-01 23:34:45Event JSON
{
"id": "8f99d2735c52c415fce2a695bf860419da8f4cdb302fd65f244a3d0c1a58e870",
"pubkey": "b0611396516cc95ba6120f8f45dbdea28af741078eb0ffa4145eef8652b8d311",
"created_at": 1696203285,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"ecd1eafee40fd0af3b43919745aa844ad844ea2de66a09fa4910d2bc4642b84f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"a6642c96f2c73dfe73c30f41562dec3ecc2147df7e8350c31e45ae5e527bb062",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"e99cb664fbde8b2635fc6df7301097733cf0844bbe2be78d6df2cac892d7f3b5",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://crlf.ninja/objects/2b08c2d0-19bf-4302-9335-0e48e7ff5503",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "I’ve mentioned on numerous occasions to nostr:npub1ang74lhyplg27w6rjxt5t25yftvyf63due4qn7jfzrftc3jzhp8sy7vfxh that the material itself is not abuse but has the potential to produce new abusers by encouraging the development of paraphilias. \n\nDo I think Lolicon should be made illegal?\n\nYes.\n\nShould Lolicon be regarded the same as actual CSAM material?\n\nNo.\n\nIf you want to draw Lolicon as part of ‘muh freedom of expression‘ then you’re free to do that, doesn’t make you any less of a weirdo, but I draw the line at the distribution of it. Do you think it’s just a coincidence that there happens to be a lot of beastiality amongst furries? \n\nIt’s because their paraphilia has been enabled through their unfettered access to material portraying the abuse of animals or those sharing their likeness. There is a direct correlation between that and beastality and Lolicon and paedophilia which is why I don’t believe that Lolicon should be made legal or allowed to be distributed. \n\nI’ve hinted on a couple of occasions that I’m a libertarian, and as a Libertarian, you can imagine I’m adverse to the notion of a government with overreaching authority. \n\nBut that is one of the few exceptions I’m willing to make to ensure a safer future for our childhood, one in which they aren’t subject to the same things you were.",
"sig": "72781258482b88a82f1cd7294318ed97210050ddb0c71958b2653d7c95767354785e942ce04db3f2838b606f96c66c0ca2cdfef2f568aee0564bd8a0f14863f2"
}