Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2024-05-29 09:14:03

John on Nostr: Geggy Tah - Mem Wordle 1,075 4/6* (found this one though, started from 'chalk', ...

Geggy Tah - Mem
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=SFUghEYTxJM

Wordle 1,075 4/6* (found this one though, started from 'chalk', although the second word counts as much)

⬛⬛🟨🟨⬛
🟨🟩⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟩🟨⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

https://www.nytimes.com/games/wordle/index.html

#Worldle #859 (29.05.2024) 1/6 (100%) (cheated)
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
🧭⭐🚩🔤👫🪙
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr

La palabra del día #874 3/6 (starting word 'manos')

⬛🟨🟩⬛⬛
⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

https://lapalabradeldia.com/

Le Mot (@WordleFR) #871 4/6 (starting word 'biens')

⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟨⬛🟨⬛
🟨⬛🟨⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

https://wordle.louan.me

Framed #810 (nope. I watched Late Night with the Devil, which was good and influenced by the BBC's also excellent Ghostwatch from 1992 as well as a lot of other things. When I say influenced by, generally speaking, I don't mean 'ripped off' which covers stuff like LLMs and plagiarism, I mean influence contributing to something substantially different or better that doesn't diminishe or reduce the currency of its influences. Not to get too nerdy, but there were some nice technical details that were difficult to do, the colour space, or gamut, was clearly based on broadcast NTSC because the black bits weren't quite black and the general tendancy towards a particular saturated colour range suited to TV broadcasts in the 1970s. They implied that it was filmed using film, which would have been unlikely for live broadcast TV, and would have been something like the RCA TK44B which used three (or in some cases four) cathode ray tube senors (Plumbicon in the 1970s). The actual output from many of the cameras exceeded the NTSC/YIQ broadcast standards, so the bump in quality, watching it in 1080p HD can be technically explained beyond 'a wizard did it', because presumably we'd be watching the, maybe, decent archive recordings, converted to digital with something like the Rec. 601 colour space and no interlacing to worry about. I particularly like the look of the later three and four tube cathode ray cameras (although much of the conversion to broadcast signal doesn't really show them off)*. I felt the black and white bits could have been a little more authentic but maybe not because the technical deficiencies of 8mm cameras in mixed light would have made it distractingly arty. Technical authenticity is not necessary, most people won't notice, and a good story matters more. The sound design was great. I'll maybe do Wordall later because I distracted myself with thinking about cameras and colour. Perception is going down another rabbit black hole.)
🎥 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥

https://framed.wtf

* I'd go as far as saying that on a high end CRT or high quality digital conversion it's more realistic, but lower resolution, than most non-cinema film. Although the ghosting and trails of earlier, worse, cathode ray cameras have their charm. People get hung up on the romance of film.
Author Public Key
npub1kl0rkn7t6r2zlnafntg5207hej3p62cafa9jxd720k4q0fgjw6jsty9ewk