Event JSON
{
"id": "9223aa6fb088af6a6d654e354f4010e16ccdb1d6ef5ef97d2dee9b12d40c2c4d",
"pubkey": "a9db022f627994eff0df5818e352cd4c865cbc8430f98d714609d8203312f161",
"created_at": 1682112405,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"082d8eb8c22c78365b80c817bb52829e03abe58d1747189a47c40ba06a5fdd5e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"5b6411ac1eb7439f197889e202d6848836b2e25803393308da387b6e04eea1a2",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"e789bceb291e2eab9e1f0e99983525af0dbc65f8e347be4330c8a2ef2dc9aa5b",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"a86fb749a7606d98d52118552bc49dec5c410bf8bf2bad9634c6c5789abd4e32",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"945bc62504e139ee899a7c6ece2606c230f40823cdf2a4b2de236da1224e58bc",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://zirk.us/users/philippsteinkrueger/statuses/110238918575319732"
]
],
"content": "#[0] #[1] does the decentral nature really preclude this? The search index wouldn’t need to be decentralized. Or at least not in the same way as the instances are. Maybe it could be like DNS. There are many DNS servers you can query, and if one of them starts to implement policies you don’t like, you switch.\n\nYou are right about the relevancy bit but I’m not sure how the distinction helps here…",
"sig": "349d76907212ee82d0efe8bf725c18f33693aeafae7466e1a061153a8114c21e440f7bf832fd16de69f79518ca41e54cedc11fec44a0cfa337178b1fce2cb890"
}