📅 Original date posted:2018-09-20
📝 Original message:
Any reason not to include _all_ (up to a limit) incoming channels with
sufficient capacity?
Cheers,
Johan
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:12 AM Rusty Russell <rusty at blockstream.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm considering a change to c-lightning, where `invoice` would
> automatically append an 'r' field for a channel which has sufficient
> *incoming* capacity for the amount (using a weighted probability across
> our peers).
>
> This isn't quite what 'r' was for, but it would be a useful
> hint for payment routing and also potentially for establishing an
> initial channel. This is an issue for the Blockstream Store which
> deliberately doesn't advertize an address any more to avoid
> centralization.
>
> Thoughts welcome!
> Rusty.
> _______________________________________________
> Lightning-dev mailing list
> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20180920/83c90ab3/attachment.html>;
Johan Torås Halseth [ARCHIVE] /
npub1pp…hs2fw
2023-06-09 12:51:30
in reply to nevent1q…w4dh
Author Public Key
npub1ppn2nhlfdzkw9gw0ytljpef5dpyzsxzw8ffcyykamt32hw6pge0smhs2fwPublished at
2023-06-09 12:51:30Event JSON
{
"id": "94c0b1e6bdc8859a2eca59186b45257257cc657d6efdb91d65bced01dd9bc0e3",
"pubkey": "0866a9dfe968ace2a1cf22ff20e534684828184e3a538212dddae2abbb41465f",
"created_at": 1686315090,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"366eecfee520115b57e1274fd7d7de990d7837f6af86b6411ee4e47e7644a309",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c018b39e951644f77caa2acb66930068f3884427889534dd08a8a48ecb59ca30",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-09-20\n📝 Original message:\nAny reason not to include _all_ (up to a limit) incoming channels with\nsufficient capacity?\n\nCheers,\nJohan\n\nOn Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:12 AM Rusty Russell \u003crusty at blockstream.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Hi all,\n\u003e\n\u003e I'm considering a change to c-lightning, where `invoice` would\n\u003e automatically append an 'r' field for a channel which has sufficient\n\u003e *incoming* capacity for the amount (using a weighted probability across\n\u003e our peers).\n\u003e\n\u003e This isn't quite what 'r' was for, but it would be a useful\n\u003e hint for payment routing and also potentially for establishing an\n\u003e initial channel. This is an issue for the Blockstream Store which\n\u003e deliberately doesn't advertize an address any more to avoid\n\u003e centralization.\n\u003e\n\u003e Thoughts welcome!\n\u003e Rusty.\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Lightning-dev mailing list\n\u003e Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20180920/83c90ab3/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "638012df90feeb3a9c5f1de3ef29d2ebab9ef3b26eb97dad270f9aa1c65e935c19a0a699a9e6db9828caba45d2af099491b9ea2d069e5738ad81fd601d6ca82e"
}