📅 Original date posted:2018-09-19
📝 Original message:
Hi all,
I'm considering a change to c-lightning, where `invoice` would
automatically append an 'r' field for a channel which has sufficient
*incoming* capacity for the amount (using a weighted probability across
our peers).
This isn't quite what 'r' was for, but it would be a useful
hint for payment routing and also potentially for establishing an
initial channel. This is an issue for the Blockstream Store which
deliberately doesn't advertize an address any more to avoid
centralization.
Thoughts welcome!
Rusty.
Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1zw…hkhpx
2023-06-09 12:51:30
in reply to nevent1q…5pkr
Author Public Key
npub1zw7cc8z78v6s3grujfvcv3ckpvg6kr0w7nz9yzvwyglyg0qu5sjsqhkhpxPublished at
2023-06-09 12:51:30Event JSON
{
"id": "c018b39e951644f77caa2acb66930068f3884427889534dd08a8a48ecb59ca30",
"pubkey": "13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425",
"created_at": 1686315090,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"366eecfee520115b57e1274fd7d7de990d7837f6af86b6411ee4e47e7644a309",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"9456f7acb763eaab2e02bd8e60cf17df74f352c2ae579dce1f1dd25c95dd611c"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-09-19\n📝 Original message:\nHi all,\n\n I'm considering a change to c-lightning, where `invoice` would\nautomatically append an 'r' field for a channel which has sufficient\n*incoming* capacity for the amount (using a weighted probability across\nour peers).\n\n This isn't quite what 'r' was for, but it would be a useful\nhint for payment routing and also potentially for establishing an\ninitial channel. This is an issue for the Blockstream Store which\ndeliberately doesn't advertize an address any more to avoid\ncentralization.\n\nThoughts welcome!\nRusty.",
"sig": "3ecb79a041e5de2d00551e1cfba73fa5af768929f614b8d50dc1571040dd116c64b7a3fb77e7270959f848fb580826b2a2fb8cff51f1ff467830d02c4335cf4a"
}