📅 Original date posted:2022-01-14
📝 Original message:I very much hope the fund will not finance lawsuits irrelevant to bitcoin.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:23 PM Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> (P2P?) Electronic Cash (Defense?) Fund or Electronic Cash Foundation ?
> More neutral, potentially covering others than Bitcoin, mimicking a bit
> EFF (even if as stated US is not the only target), referring to
> Satoshi's paper where everything started
>
> Maybe I am not up to date but it would be good to know what are the
> current procedures with the Tulip thing
>
> Aymeric
>
>
> Le 13/01/2022 à 19:20, jack via bitcoin-dev a écrit :
> > Hi Prayank,
> >
> >> On 13 Jan 2022, at 10:13, Prayank <prayank at tutanota.de> wrote:
> >> I had few suggestions and feel free to ignore them if they do not make
> sense:
> >>
> >> 1.Name of this fund could be anything and 'The Bitcoin Legal Defense
> Fund' can be confusing or misleading for newbies. There is nothing official
> in Bitcoin however people believe things written in news articles and some
> of them might consider it as an official bitcoin legal fund.
> > Excellent point. Will come up with a better name.
> >
> >> 2.It would be better if people involved in such important funds do not
> comment/influence soft fork related discussions. Example: Alex Morcos had
> some opinions about activation mechanism during Taproot soft fork IIRC.
> > Yes. Will think through this and board operating principles we can share
> publicly, which would probably include criteria for how cases are chosen,
> to protect against this board and fund influencing direction.
> >
> > Open to ideas and suggestions on all.
> >
> > jack
> > _______________________________________________
> > bitcoin-dev mailing list
> > bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220114/a0a62882/attachment.html>;
qmccormick13 [ARCHIVE] /
npub18u…d2vcm
2023-06-07 23:02:12
in reply to nevent1q…dyg5
Author Public Key
npub18uwky8823vd9v6406z5v49thzzrhvqmupvcvadh3ycl3f0zywylqld2vcmPublished at
2023-06-07 23:02:12Event JSON
{
"id": "d5bda4392c2eaa69fe3fd78603fa83de38b7c9fab7ed12dc62160af4ea95f941",
"pubkey": "3f1d621cea8b1a566aafd0a8ca9577108776037c0b30ceb6f1263f14bc44713e",
"created_at": 1686178932,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"443042b0aa96ce2d271112433bb74a7bfca0428070eacc1452cf90f9aaac0a5b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"bbd2a7f83d0412e8a5d5b2627e60450370ee7d6f79fda4e190aa139e53c7d2f8",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a2711d6616d348a3542bb2a791a9e51fcbc7b7d1d20652e5abe16d3e179321df"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2022-01-14\n📝 Original message:I very much hope the fund will not finance lawsuits irrelevant to bitcoin.\n\nOn Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:23 PM Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e (P2P?) Electronic Cash (Defense?) Fund or Electronic Cash Foundation ?\n\u003e More neutral, potentially covering others than Bitcoin, mimicking a bit\n\u003e EFF (even if as stated US is not the only target), referring to\n\u003e Satoshi's paper where everything started\n\u003e\n\u003e Maybe I am not up to date but it would be good to know what are the\n\u003e current procedures with the Tulip thing\n\u003e\n\u003e Aymeric\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Le 13/01/2022 à 19:20, jack via bitcoin-dev a écrit :\n\u003e \u003e Hi Prayank,\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e\u003e On 13 Jan 2022, at 10:13, Prayank \u003cprayank at tutanota.de\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e\u003e I had few suggestions and feel free to ignore them if they do not make\n\u003e sense:\n\u003e \u003e\u003e\n\u003e \u003e\u003e 1.Name of this fund could be anything and 'The Bitcoin Legal Defense\n\u003e Fund' can be confusing or misleading for newbies. There is nothing official\n\u003e in Bitcoin however people believe things written in news articles and some\n\u003e of them might consider it as an official bitcoin legal fund.\n\u003e \u003e Excellent point. Will come up with a better name.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e\u003e 2.It would be better if people involved in such important funds do not\n\u003e comment/influence soft fork related discussions. Example: Alex Morcos had\n\u003e some opinions about activation mechanism during Taproot soft fork IIRC.\n\u003e \u003e Yes. Will think through this and board operating principles we can share\n\u003e publicly, which would probably include criteria for how cases are chosen,\n\u003e to protect against this board and fund influencing direction.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Open to ideas and suggestions on all.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e jack\n\u003e \u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e \u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e \u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e \u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220114/a0a62882/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "bacd17e7ab20317a0854d3808028c8f72205c423c8a7d24cdfc053090dd8c9e8339bfd7ede79d4e7a08b40815bb1cf0074ed88d4a3ced2b35db6bc3c020ed38c"
}