📅 Original date posted:2022-01-14
📝 Original message:(P2P?) Electronic Cash (Defense?) Fund or Electronic Cash Foundation ?
More neutral, potentially covering others than Bitcoin, mimicking a bit
EFF (even if as stated US is not the only target), referring to
Satoshi's paper where everything started
Maybe I am not up to date but it would be good to know what are the
current procedures with the Tulip thing
Aymeric
Le 13/01/2022 à 19:20, jack via bitcoin-dev a écrit :
> Hi Prayank,
>
>> On 13 Jan 2022, at 10:13, Prayank <prayank at tutanota.de> wrote:
>> I had few suggestions and feel free to ignore them if they do not make sense:
>>
>> 1.Name of this fund could be anything and 'The Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund' can be confusing or misleading for newbies. There is nothing official in Bitcoin however people believe things written in news articles and some of them might consider it as an official bitcoin legal fund.
> Excellent point. Will come up with a better name.
>
>> 2.It would be better if people involved in such important funds do not comment/influence soft fork related discussions. Example: Alex Morcos had some opinions about activation mechanism during Taproot soft fork IIRC.
> Yes. Will think through this and board operating principles we can share publicly, which would probably include criteria for how cases are chosen, to protect against this board and fund influencing direction.
>
> Open to ideas and suggestions on all.
>
> jack
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
Aymeric Vitte [ARCHIVE] /
npub15f…g5grz
2023-06-07 23:02:12
in reply to nevent1q…42fm
Author Public Key
npub15fc36esk6dy2x4ptk2ner209rl9u0d736gr99edtu9knu9uny80s4g5grzPublished at
2023-06-07 23:02:12Event JSON
{
"id": "bbd2a7f83d0412e8a5d5b2627e60450370ee7d6f79fda4e190aa139e53c7d2f8",
"pubkey": "a2711d6616d348a3542bb2a791a9e51fcbc7b7d1d20652e5abe16d3e179321df",
"created_at": 1686178932,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"443042b0aa96ce2d271112433bb74a7bfca0428070eacc1452cf90f9aaac0a5b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"285b35737453468b7a3b579064e261f9072132299d89ae3921dc288a30fc73cf",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"396cf7c8dc8aeec27d25e85d0047d1c95bd9dff7d251fe82c88a190cabef29a3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2022-01-14\n📝 Original message:(P2P?) Electronic Cash (Defense?) Fund or Electronic Cash Foundation ?\nMore neutral, potentially covering others than Bitcoin, mimicking a bit\nEFF (even if as stated US is not the only target), referring to\nSatoshi's paper where everything started\n\nMaybe I am not up to date but it would be good to know what are the\ncurrent procedures with the Tulip thing\n\nAymeric\n\n\nLe 13/01/2022 à 19:20, jack via bitcoin-dev a écrit :\n\u003e Hi Prayank,\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e On 13 Jan 2022, at 10:13, Prayank \u003cprayank at tutanota.de\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e I had few suggestions and feel free to ignore them if they do not make sense:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e 1.Name of this fund could be anything and 'The Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund' can be confusing or misleading for newbies. There is nothing official in Bitcoin however people believe things written in news articles and some of them might consider it as an official bitcoin legal fund.\n\u003e Excellent point. Will come up with a better name.\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e 2.It would be better if people involved in such important funds do not comment/influence soft fork related discussions. Example: Alex Morcos had some opinions about activation mechanism during Taproot soft fork IIRC.\n\u003e Yes. Will think through this and board operating principles we can share publicly, which would probably include criteria for how cases are chosen, to protect against this board and fund influencing direction.\n\u003e\n\u003e Open to ideas and suggestions on all.\n\u003e\n\u003e jack\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev",
"sig": "82a94dd465e133e9d2eb8011f91367c10677d77944392683c5e248276a33b3a761f07b262a06caaafc266154f1f1a49cfcadde9259741a1f73e7e7652eec2936"
}