≠ (nprofile…0d5n)
Nobody said society is only abusive to women.
> Porn is a natural outgrowth of sexual liberation.
> You will not have one without the other.
This is like saying slavery is a natural outgrowth of agriculture and one cannot exist without the other. It's extremely pessimistic and wrong.
It might be that you're using the definition of "pornography" that porn shills have successfully inserted into the public mindset through decades of propaganda, which is: "Any depiction of sexuality is pornography."
Making sure that no linguistic distinction exists between positive and negative depictions of sexuality is an extremely effective method of ensuring that negative depictions of sexuality cannot be criticized, as any such criticism can then be discarded as puritanism, as if it's a criticism of all portrayal of sexuality.
But if you read, for example, the definition of "pornography" put forth in the Civil Rights Ordinance (MacKinnon & Dworkin) you will notice that it's very restricted and makes it abundantly clear that positive and neutral depictions of sexuality are not included in it.
Taylan (Now 18% More Deranged) /
npub1uz…7hsyy
2024-12-28 03:06:50
in reply to nevent1q…yrq7
Author Public Key
npub1uzcsm7540llpxa2mk3ajkcz8r62sghjkveqjvnq2xcykhfuxfxtq77hsyyPublished at
2024-12-28 03:06:50Event JSON
{
"id": "d6e0424125cf830ff34f3c034f28d2747a58efd2ad18cf98f63da401e4dfd147",
"pubkey": "e0b10dfa957ffe13755bb47b2b60471e95045e566641264c0a36096ba7864996",
"created_at": 1735355210,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"f0c62461e196b291440354b08cb4b64556caa2cfe29776cdcfd80e13adc07dc4",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"9828f33e15402e9f4d7fabc566e788674382834638b61f52999d5b60f198f37a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://fedi.feministwiki.org/objects/f72cf13a-03a8-4456-906e-471cbe25fea1",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq7rrzgc0pj6efz3qr2jcged9kg4tv4gk0u2thdnw0mq8p8twq0hzqln0d5n \n\nNobody said society is only abusive to women.\n\n\u003e Porn is a natural outgrowth of sexual liberation.\n\u003e You will not have one without the other.\n\nThis is like saying slavery is a natural outgrowth of agriculture and one cannot exist without the other. It's extremely pessimistic and wrong.\n\nIt might be that you're using the definition of \"pornography\" that porn shills have successfully inserted into the public mindset through decades of propaganda, which is: \"Any depiction of sexuality is pornography.\"\n\nMaking sure that no linguistic distinction exists between positive and negative depictions of sexuality is an extremely effective method of ensuring that negative depictions of sexuality cannot be criticized, as any such criticism can then be discarded as puritanism, as if it's a criticism of all portrayal of sexuality.\n\nBut if you read, for example, the definition of \"pornography\" put forth in the Civil Rights Ordinance (MacKinnon \u0026 Dworkin) you will notice that it's very restricted and makes it abundantly clear that positive and neutral depictions of sexuality are not included in it.",
"sig": "5abd316a3968b99a4fb68985725f80b1adb9ae20bb4e8c2e2dc21937478e7b5ec35ef54aef5d5048783d93aafd9ac1a3bce61bfcdcc9c080ff767262377b9271"
}