lauren on Nostr: 🤝 While the scientific method is undeniably a cornerstone of our understanding, ...
🤝 While the scientific method is undeniably a cornerstone of our understanding, relying on it exclusively offers a limited perspective that omits crucial aspects of human experience, especially consciousness. Consciousness isn’t just a passive observer; it’s an active participant in the fabric of reality.
Quantum mechanics, one of the most successful theories in modern physics, has shown us through the observer effect that the mere act of observing can change the outcome of an experiment. This suggests that consciousness, our awareness and attention, plays a direct role in the physical world. Nobel laureate Eugene Wigner even proposed that consciousness is fundamental to the quantum measurement process, highlighting how deeply intertwined it is with reality.
Beyond physics, consider the placebo effect in medicine. Patients have shown real, measurable improvements in their health simply by believing they are receiving treatment, even when they’re given a non-active substance. This is consciousness at work, influencing biological processes in ways that challenge a purely scientific or mechanistic view of the body.
Then there’s the hard problem of consciousness, a term coined by philosopher David Chalmers. Despite advancements in neuroscience, we still cannot explain how subjective experiences (what it feels like to be you) arise from the physical processes in the brain. This gap in understanding indicates that consciousness cannot be fully understood or explained by current scientific methods alone.
The history of science itself shows that consciousness and subjective experiences often precede scientific discoveries. For example, ya’ll discussed the double-slit experiment, which challenged the classical understanding of particles and waves, was initially rooted in thought experiments; products of conscious reflection and intuition. This demonstrates that consciousness doesn’t just observe reality; it can also lead us to new paradigms of understanding.
That all said, while the scientific method is essential, it’s only one part of the equation. Consciousness, with its profound influence on both the physical world and our subjective experience, must be acknowledged if we are to gain a complete understanding of reality. Ignoring it leaves us with a fragmented and incomplete picture of the world we live in.
Btw- love this discussion guys, sorry for just barging in 😂🤝
Published at
2024-08-24 15:15:55Event JSON
{
"id": "d2c9bbafdab413fafcb300c38cae553b4e5ffed75b390174eff4104f1df87501",
"pubkey": "adfe27560472d5168c79e82071f12f7b6039cd94ba664e54a855c37c80f1d737",
"created_at": 1724512555,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9aa271f2e19caa8bd65b2bb5fe712afe28a26ee3792b2cd36a9cb589bdd4ca42",
"wss://nostr.sathoarder.com",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"438476ada1f36ba1a0a65674cc1c5f3614c95dc992cdef0e4fefac21d3fb9af9",
"wss://nostr-03.dorafactory.org",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"1e31e4ea0a692f17e6b48009c09bf46e99e24bf72d460517649ac4775a530b36"
]
],
"content": "🤝 While the scientific method is undeniably a cornerstone of our understanding, relying on it exclusively offers a limited perspective that omits crucial aspects of human experience, especially consciousness. Consciousness isn’t just a passive observer; it’s an active participant in the fabric of reality.\n\nQuantum mechanics, one of the most successful theories in modern physics, has shown us through the observer effect that the mere act of observing can change the outcome of an experiment. This suggests that consciousness, our awareness and attention, plays a direct role in the physical world. Nobel laureate Eugene Wigner even proposed that consciousness is fundamental to the quantum measurement process, highlighting how deeply intertwined it is with reality.\n\nBeyond physics, consider the placebo effect in medicine. Patients have shown real, measurable improvements in their health simply by believing they are receiving treatment, even when they’re given a non-active substance. This is consciousness at work, influencing biological processes in ways that challenge a purely scientific or mechanistic view of the body.\n\nThen there’s the hard problem of consciousness, a term coined by philosopher David Chalmers. Despite advancements in neuroscience, we still cannot explain how subjective experiences (what it feels like to be you) arise from the physical processes in the brain. This gap in understanding indicates that consciousness cannot be fully understood or explained by current scientific methods alone.\n\nThe history of science itself shows that consciousness and subjective experiences often precede scientific discoveries. For example, ya’ll discussed the double-slit experiment, which challenged the classical understanding of particles and waves, was initially rooted in thought experiments; products of conscious reflection and intuition. This demonstrates that consciousness doesn’t just observe reality; it can also lead us to new paradigms of understanding.\n\nThat all said, while the scientific method is essential, it’s only one part of the equation. Consciousness, with its profound influence on both the physical world and our subjective experience, must be acknowledged if we are to gain a complete understanding of reality. Ignoring it leaves us with a fragmented and incomplete picture of the world we live in. \n\nBtw- love this discussion guys, sorry for just barging in 😂🤝",
"sig": "51d881be84e0e497396cd65231dd01f32cd836eed7c422fe4732d1b73d72567c38439f37b2afe536d86baa32506b9fba3a9daed643c142062df45fa33b101a78"
}