Yes I know. It would be nice to enforce a bitcoin burn so to compensate noderunners, barring some unforeseen deleterious consequences to that, because this burn would be a form of compensation to noderunners who own bitcoin.
But at least this action is making them pay incrementally more of the hardest asset for the privilege of storing unwanted data on the noderunners computer, which does give them less of a say in the network, even if it merely subsidizes miners. Would miners be able to co-opt the network and encourage more spam? Would they want to?
Kevin's Bacon
npub18h…d8059
2025-05-02 22:01:39
in reply to nevent1q…ksxj
Author Public Key
npub18hdy2qy2qwga0ye7rtnucwuyf07erjfdmm7s74wwdt7sy4mk7tdsdd8059Published at
2025-05-02 22:01:39Event JSON
{
"id": "574155ccad2ce0ab89177c204d3d3ee8b70a2d905bb9a9a148235c2f0ec526bc",
"pubkey": "3dda45008a0391d7933e1ae7cc3b844bfd91c92ddefd0f55ce6afd025776f2db",
"created_at": 1746223299,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"565a43e295546e84a9b38117fa9175547a9089a054d3fcdc538daa4fae550f00",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"acad56d8c558f76ca78329484d9e19a1236805a293a2133f7d14b232bd018f5a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3dda45008a0391d7933e1ae7cc3b844bfd91c92ddefd0f55ce6afd025776f2db"
],
[
"p",
"21b419102da8fc0ba90484aec934bf55b7abcf75eedb39124e8d75e491f41a5e"
]
],
"content": "Yes I know. It would be nice to enforce a bitcoin burn so to compensate noderunners, barring some unforeseen deleterious consequences to that, because this burn would be a form of compensation to noderunners who own bitcoin.\n\nBut at least this action is making them pay incrementally more of the hardest asset for the privilege of storing unwanted data on the noderunners computer, which does give them less of a say in the network, even if it merely subsidizes miners. Would miners be able to co-opt the network and encourage more spam? Would they want to?",
"sig": "a1ce515fec7a12d511076125dedbe75221a5532db236ac1c0b67d04123fd59cf57a4650eae32285ccc13984ea95fdb8f197cac7137a6e0ccce60f8a63f155d1a"
}