I’m looking at it through a legal lens using the entitlement structure model outline by Madeline Morris in her 1993 Cornell Law Review article. People relate to objects (I’m calling a bitcoin an object even though it’s digital) through entitlements. Entitlements are protected by rules, and in this case I am advocating for using a pure property rule to evaluate bitcoin. A pure property rule means the “owner” has the right to monetary compensation for the object, the right to in-kind use and enjoyment, the right to initiate a transaction, and the right to veto a transaction. This is all with respect to another person. So in this sense I see it as being owned by the key holder. Possession is a big part of that, obviously. Perhaps it’s the case that that the keys are the physical instantiation of the bitcoin, but I am not sure we can sever the link between the keys and the coins and say we own one and merry possess the other.
I wish i was back in law school so I’d have time to write a paper on this! I also wrote a law school paper on blockchain and maintaining records of title ownership to land. But a property analysis of bitcoin is way more interesting.
/ todmann67
npub1n8…a72hl
2024-02-22 16:14:25
in reply to nevent1q…3er3
Author Public Key
npub1n8pdnhkukhs4xa0a74u9zkhqfcw39h48xcte4gkp8d8c4s2rx45qua72hlPublished at
2024-02-22 16:14:25Event JSON
{
"id": "5c049525a5d565cf5b524bc53a13268f87f193c669dbec2917fd7a837c204df4",
"pubkey": "99c2d9dedcb5e15375fdf578515ae04e1d12dea736179aa2c13b4f8ac1433568",
"created_at": 1708618465,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"bc7d563bc09213f9cdd6dfdbbdb77924090a9fc7915a99402f5112ce88fcec3a"
],
[
"e",
"159b2b07f2dc51a318461951ac03fc4a9a5fa59a3771e70ea7ebef3f6cb33c95"
],
[
"p",
"59fbee7369df7713dbbfa9bbdb0892c62eba929232615c6ff2787da384cb770f"
],
[
"p",
"652d58acafa105af8475c0fe8029a52e7ddbc337b2bd9c98bb17a111dc4cde60"
]
],
"content": "I’m looking at it through a legal lens using the entitlement structure model outline by Madeline Morris in her 1993 Cornell Law Review article. People relate to objects (I’m calling a bitcoin an object even though it’s digital) through entitlements. Entitlements are protected by rules, and in this case I am advocating for using a pure property rule to evaluate bitcoin. A pure property rule means the “owner” has the right to monetary compensation for the object, the right to in-kind use and enjoyment, the right to initiate a transaction, and the right to veto a transaction. This is all with respect to another person. So in this sense I see it as being owned by the key holder. Possession is a big part of that, obviously. Perhaps it’s the case that that the keys are the physical instantiation of the bitcoin, but I am not sure we can sever the link between the keys and the coins and say we own one and merry possess the other. \nI wish i was back in law school so I’d have time to write a paper on this! I also wrote a law school paper on blockchain and maintaining records of title ownership to land. But a property analysis of bitcoin is way more interesting.",
"sig": "a28b4b72ac7933a06da918ba08c0c880ba842f9aba22f728f13a87f1a3a95526488328576ae89196cf202809af6847678278a5799675b3ee4c2ce0e9f638e1ed"
}