Big Barry Bitcoin on Nostr: I think it is for the "good actors" who would rather build a protocol that is ...
I think it is for the "good actors" who would rather build a protocol that is sustainable and uses something fit for purpose than to hack a solution with negative effects for users.
And to be clear, I am not pro or against this change, since it is not a consensus change, if I see negative externalities that don't look to disappear naturally, then I will switch to a client that adopts filters and encourage others to do so also. It'll certainly be an easier sell at that point in time.
Published at
2025-05-09 17:53:17Event JSON
{
"id": "5c1ee094236fd5d40f999ea40ff1bba1fe8e2758ce189e10431f32663546b1db",
"pubkey": "0d97beae567fcec9c6574f1c6ef6126ea969d4992c3198e51c0fac52c5274a14",
"created_at": 1746813197,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9ef1cb7f3e899ca1a9889fd33eed4955af291ba3d65881b2e2ff5bb3836ee94e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"45deb6c4065565d045e1a2c4629a2355f4f440b45679c2ae94f2f5316f9e239e"
],
[
"e",
"3bd43f1212d84e9239fde53f9bf09d99cb2ec11357f744d9c0c13b1e94da3b8f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"678a308e59c24ee1b342b0fe9abdf6fdfa5dccc30aeb275a537e1f7fa0609fbc"
],
[
"p",
"0d97beae567fcec9c6574f1c6ef6126ea969d4992c3198e51c0fac52c5274a14"
]
],
"content": "I think it is for the \"good actors\" who would rather build a protocol that is sustainable and uses something fit for purpose than to hack a solution with negative effects for users.\n\nAnd to be clear, I am not pro or against this change, since it is not a consensus change, if I see negative externalities that don't look to disappear naturally, then I will switch to a client that adopts filters and encourage others to do so also. It'll certainly be an easier sell at that point in time. ",
"sig": "efba7bb345cb4f1c7f21a2bc5bfdb58da405a7c48b39671965887d6a499136cbd4c6b1ff9e42263815c7e13844aa311ce78736c65828bf218820db0401358227"
}