I'm not interested in the political angle of this story, but I nerd out on the cybersecurity.
The act of sending military strategy to a journalist who responsibly disclosed the leak is not that big a deal. It's a UX problem for Signal. I have made the same mistake. In fact, on that same day, I thougt I sent a private message in a group chat, but I sent it to my wife. It wasn't a big deal, She's in the group chat I meant to send the message to anyway, but it means Signal is not suitable for tin-foil hat level security.
I would never send two multi-signature bitcoin keys with Signal because of this UX, zero day exploits, etc.
I assume all Internet connected devices are pwned. This is basic stuff NVK (nprofile…vvup)
Incessantly talks about.
Marc26z
npub1ma…tf3g0
2025-03-26 18:19:05
in reply to nevent1q…9wrf
Author Public Key
npub1marc26z8nh3xkj5rcx7ufkatvx6ueqhp5vfw9v5teq26z254renshtf3g0Published at
2025-03-26 18:19:05Event JSON
{
"id": "57c6f8feb482385dab9e545d7a03b73aa4cb16567555dda2e9792e1d449e6e9d",
"pubkey": "df478568479de26b4a83c1bdc4dbab61b5cc82e1a312e2b28bc815a12a951e67",
"created_at": 1743013145,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e88a691e98d9987c964521dff60025f60700378a4879180dcbbb4a5027850411",
"wss://Nostr.wine",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"460c25e682fda7832b52d1f22d3d22b3176d972f60dcdc3212ed8c92ef85065c"
],
[
"p",
"5af0794606a15b5641e25aa23d04af4cb0d7d5e68b11cacb47e56a4698fca8c4",
"wss://@nos.lol"
],
[
"p",
"460c25e682fda7832b52d1f22d3d22b3176d972f60dcdc3212ed8c92ef85065c",
"ws://192.168.18.7:7777"
],
[
"e",
"370e440d5079f838b5cb12320a262b41b66301a41d1624ec475cc5bd1f9cdf5b",
"wss://@nos.lol",
"reply",
"5af0794606a15b5641e25aa23d04af4cb0d7d5e68b11cacb47e56a4698fca8c4"
],
[
"e",
"1f47debf90e71d8cf91dda98fd6edefdc69c2ef8b945681c64e4a342b0b2dbe1",
"ws://192.168.18.7:7777",
"root",
"460c25e682fda7832b52d1f22d3d22b3176d972f60dcdc3212ed8c92ef85065c"
]
],
"content": "I'm not interested in the political angle of this story, but I nerd out on the cybersecurity. \n\nThe act of sending military strategy to a journalist who responsibly disclosed the leak is not that big a deal. It's a UX problem for Signal. I have made the same mistake. In fact, on that same day, I thougt I sent a private message in a group chat, but I sent it to my wife. It wasn't a big deal, She's in the group chat I meant to send the message to anyway, but it means Signal is not suitable for tin-foil hat level security.\n\nI would never send two multi-signature bitcoin keys with Signal because of this UX, zero day exploits, etc. \n\nI assume all Internet connected devices are pwned. This is basic stuff nostr:nprofile1qqsw3znfr6vdnxrujezjrhlkqqjlvpcqx79ys7gcph9mkjjsy7zsgygpzpmhxue69uh5ummnw3ezuamfdejsz9thwden5te0v4jx2m3wdehhxarj9ekxzmnymlvvup\nIncessantly talks about.\n\n\n\n\n ",
"sig": "f28a404f130afdfc72598ef063646aee274f38568341155060dc16bba0e77d932b00c4d4af70bb0c882b3543c8dae0c49303e7dc01fa23331fd7796c36a0656d"
}