📅 Original date posted:2014-05-13
📝 Original message:bitcore guesses the network from the address version in several places in
its code. They don't want to change that. Perhaps it wasn't the wisest
approach for them to use. I thought it might be simple to change the
address version since its still relatively new and it isn't a real network.
Would it be too much work to change?
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote:
> Yes, bitcoinj supports and uses regtest mode. It would also have to be
> changed.
>
> You didn't provide a rationale for this. What's the cost of having them be
> the same?
>
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I propose changing all of the address versions in -regtest mode to be
>> unique so they are no longer identical to testnet.
>>
>> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/List_of_address_prefixes
>> For example, regtest pubkey hash addresses could begin with r or R.
>>
>> We need to know if any existing tools would need to be modified to
>> support this change to regtest. Do existing tools outside of pull tester
>> expect regtest to have testnet addresses? If the quantity of tools that
>> currently handle regtest is small then we can modify them to the new
>> address versions.
>>
>> Warren Togami
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
>> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
>> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform
>> available
>> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140513/bb49c804/attachment.html>;
Warren Togami Jr. [ARCHIVE] /
npub1s5…zxem8
2023-06-07 15:21:19
in reply to nevent1q…4nsd
Author Public Key
npub1s5p2xnl52ksr3a4qfa8re5znmja46ugm3x3ayy0x2c2mqrsw6ewsmzxem8Seen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:21:19Event JSON
{
"id": "75e9fc01bfd79eb8171dad60e4d59db10b2e18c1c63d6ff33a29f15a561dd02d",
"pubkey": "8502a34ff455a038f6a04f4e3cd053dcbb5d711b89a3d211e65615b00e0ed65d",
"created_at": 1686151279,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"348f6a35204a464f3761d9c439e7da8b7898f475700c8fa1ddf8f13fc1a31182",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"45a5bf7d3bf8a72cd0a10ea666b7192b58526666e99ac2374627290cd7fb4501",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-05-13\n📝 Original message:bitcore guesses the network from the address version in several places in\nits code. They don't want to change that. Perhaps it wasn't the wisest\napproach for them to use. I thought it might be simple to change the\naddress version since its still relatively new and it isn't a real network.\n Would it be too much work to change?\n\n\nOn Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Yes, bitcoinj supports and uses regtest mode. It would also have to be\n\u003e changed.\n\u003e\n\u003e You didn't provide a rationale for this. What's the cost of having them be\n\u003e the same?\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Warren Togami Jr. \u003cwtogami at gmail.com\u003ewrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Hi folks,\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e I propose changing all of the address versions in -regtest mode to be\n\u003e\u003e unique so they are no longer identical to testnet.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/List_of_address_prefixes\n\u003e\u003e For example, regtest pubkey hash addresses could begin with r or R.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e We need to know if any existing tools would need to be modified to\n\u003e\u003e support this change to regtest. Do existing tools outside of pull tester\n\u003e\u003e expect regtest to have testnet addresses? If the quantity of tools that\n\u003e\u003e currently handle regtest is small then we can modify them to the new\n\u003e\u003e address versions.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Warren Togami\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e\u003e \"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE\n\u003e\u003e Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.\n\u003e\u003e Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform\n\u003e\u003e available\n\u003e\u003e Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.\"\n\u003e\u003e http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs\n\u003e\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140513/bb49c804/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "aa93f526e373b038695496fe538ad4e7eea456a78d32df0e193ef47907b42c2750487f37a142c9e574099fc676e9b6608e2b1c88fb5a898c6ef7f18be3af2aba"
}