📅 Original date posted:2014-05-13
📝 Original message:Yes, bitcoinj supports and uses regtest mode. It would also have to be
changed.
You didn't provide a rationale for this. What's the cost of having them be
the same?
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami at gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I propose changing all of the address versions in -regtest mode to be
> unique so they are no longer identical to testnet.
>
> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/List_of_address_prefixes
> For example, regtest pubkey hash addresses could begin with r or R.
>
> We need to know if any existing tools would need to be modified to support
> this change to regtest. Do existing tools outside of pull tester expect
> regtest to have testnet addresses? If the quantity of tools that currently
> handle regtest is small then we can modify them to the new address versions.
>
> Warren Togami
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform
> available
> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140513/baf17532/attachment.html>;
Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] /
npub17t…4qgyd
2023-06-07 15:21:19
in reply to nevent1q…jpae
Author Public Key
npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydPublished at
2023-06-07 15:21:19Event JSON
{
"id": "45a5bf7d3bf8a72cd0a10ea666b7192b58526666e99ac2374627290cd7fb4501",
"pubkey": "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2",
"created_at": 1686151279,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"348f6a35204a464f3761d9c439e7da8b7898f475700c8fa1ddf8f13fc1a31182",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"4ec14d330140f2135b81ced9cff01ce1d2059ccd1f840d60fb2411195b7f3a78",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"8502a34ff455a038f6a04f4e3cd053dcbb5d711b89a3d211e65615b00e0ed65d"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-05-13\n📝 Original message:Yes, bitcoinj supports and uses regtest mode. It would also have to be\nchanged.\n\nYou didn't provide a rationale for this. What's the cost of having them be\nthe same?\n\n\nOn Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Warren Togami Jr. \u003cwtogami at gmail.com\u003ewrote:\n\n\u003e Hi folks,\n\u003e\n\u003e I propose changing all of the address versions in -regtest mode to be\n\u003e unique so they are no longer identical to testnet.\n\u003e\n\u003e https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/List_of_address_prefixes\n\u003e For example, regtest pubkey hash addresses could begin with r or R.\n\u003e\n\u003e We need to know if any existing tools would need to be modified to support\n\u003e this change to regtest. Do existing tools outside of pull tester expect\n\u003e regtest to have testnet addresses? If the quantity of tools that currently\n\u003e handle regtest is small then we can modify them to the new address versions.\n\u003e\n\u003e Warren Togami\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e \"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE\n\u003e Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.\n\u003e Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform\n\u003e available\n\u003e Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.\"\n\u003e http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140513/baf17532/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "a33c482b3ac998e31a6b065680c4ff056bc7631ea5462e508397414a3f08414528b9f6434aacf82cfe917048d14cac4493d946fb6221fb6fa6be95408321935f"
}