Good morning, here’s some Saturday political science for you! Today’s source is “What’s good for the goose is bad for the gander” by Steven’s, et al.
Negative attacks in presidential campaigns work when even members of the candidate’s own party have to admit the attack is true.
Nathaniel Swigger /
npub1uy…rpv7p
2024-08-03 12:00:46
Author Public Key
npub1uyyrp7cdt9hkjw9z0d8wyau36926luhtysa09sswedawqtcw4cqsjrpv7pPublished at
2024-08-03 12:00:46Event JSON
{
"id": "7824e750c80a408c8c5c0f94b3a2439b8bd78faf6815c41ace5393e56013723e",
"pubkey": "e10830fb0d596f6938a27b4ee27791d155aff2eb243af2c20ecb7ae02f0eae01",
"created_at": 1722686446,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mstdn.party/users/nswigger/statuses/112897978982657278",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Good morning, here’s some Saturday political science for you! Today’s source is “What’s good for the goose is bad for the gander” by Steven’s, et al.\n\nNegative attacks in presidential campaigns work when even members of the candidate’s own party have to admit the attack is true.",
"sig": "42e38d7394b382f4ba09e3d60bf3dadcd1e53023dd6be562c608fd0b7a8e3e83e63598f9ef3389d00154430e930d922ac0552c13c4cddfb7949bc9bf59cfffcb"
}