Does this mean that as a potential metric for adoption, we should most likely exclude sats that are lying unused for more than some time from the market cap, and only count sats that actively change hands?
In addition, this would also exclude abandoned wallets whose owners lost the keys, which to me sounds like a good thing. These bitcoins are essentially burned and are doing nothing productive.
Vika
npub179…rqced
2023-09-13 13:47:11
in reply to nevent1q…89z6
Author Public Key
npub179hkmppz8m44dt0r7cg6f2jnn4shyew5fmu6uc9s9wle2s5s287qarqcedPublished at
2023-09-13 13:47:11Event JSON
{
"id": "7949bd4b17f8360b2091de7c94529b5fd918b27bceec5cdfeb7edb7aad71f701",
"pubkey": "f16f6d84223eeb56ade3f611a4aa539d617265d44ef9ae60b02bbf95429051fc",
"created_at": 1694612831,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f9eff7c1ceddb3ca586be80cb8a098fc82b43588c454910e6b9b51328d9a5552",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7564a27aae32ab0c593e26d134c475405e4034f7e38f61248b57e47fdf77f725"
]
],
"content": "Does this mean that as a potential metric for adoption, we should most likely exclude sats that are lying unused for more than some time from the market cap, and only count sats that actively change hands?\n\nIn addition, this would also exclude abandoned wallets whose owners lost the keys, which to me sounds like a good thing. These bitcoins are essentially burned and are doing nothing productive.",
"sig": "9d38377773adf6a5bd3dfe7e2ddc4d05e974045997c9757e2ec4890dfffac58e2e9f0878a636299e726730ba3ab2ded99bbd0d440e5d56081d0c8db26b310bf7"
}