What would a doctrine of squatter's rights look like for digital places?
I don't really think this is realistic. It would be nice if there were provisions to more easily turn a website over to collective ownership. Leave it to the users to keep the server coffers full. There are places that work in this manner but in a legal sense they aren't really governed this way. Almost always there are 1 or 2 people who could simply shut the place down. Or let it slowly fall apart neglecting software.
myrmepropagandist /
npub1cp…uhrnq
2023-06-10 10:03:44
in reply to nevent1q…guep
Author Public Key
npub1cp2pgntkzkpqa23rytnchggwzywyggvst9yzkgd6w8j349ef7s9shuhrnqPublished at
2023-06-10 10:03:44Event JSON
{
"id": "7ba1498aa99ba039a3fade778bd0499090f727ab99d25df836149374a5cad9b8",
"pubkey": "c054144d7615820eaa2322e78ba10e111c44219059482b21ba71e51a9729f40b",
"created_at": 1686391424,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"40948b76b41bcfe3027de96eecddad545de6c7d4eec152f49bd9e31acdc135f9",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://sauropods.win/users/futurebird/statuses/110519348365142206"
]
],
"content": "What would a doctrine of squatter's rights look like for digital places?\n\nI don't really think this is realistic. It would be nice if there were provisions to more easily turn a website over to collective ownership. Leave it to the users to keep the server coffers full. There are places that work in this manner but in a legal sense they aren't really governed this way. Almost always there are 1 or 2 people who could simply shut the place down. Or let it slowly fall apart neglecting software.",
"sig": "b59d8bc07451f3ec40074818dde30caeb67a35e38affb8e7eff943c3b2acf09905a7fd45133ad4f01b672df85910d85dd24da926e40ee25696ec94a8401259c4"
}