feld (nprofile…xyvy) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqjd874v63430gng67kpw5m597f34dr9vr0yhkp8dkmnma8208raysyd6kk0 (nprofile…6kk0) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq20att7fsg93mvxnk3v27vsgn8jxdhrqhpw0xnk2k5d3g4l8ka67qr63cjl (nprofile…3cjl) Your frame of reference is not the same as mine. You're talking about why individuals cannot switch and the political forces pushed on them. When I make those statements, I think of the political forces and the social structures that create a world where civilized (as opposed to entirely virgin) areas have to use gas.
Assuming cooking with gas is half as efficient as electric of induction (pretty sure that’s not too far from the truth), and let's say a population is using 1MW of power only for cooking with gas (converted from BTU etc), flatly replacing all those appliances by electric ones and keeping the gas for electricity generation would yield you another 1MW of power to use for anything else.
If you could half the cost of energy usage for cooking country-wide, as a politician, wouldn't you do it?
Clearly the people of your country have decided to make such efficiencies illegal, the question now is "why”, "how did we let this happen” and "how can we prevent this in the future”