š
Original date posted:2017-06-06
š Original message:Please read my email more carefully; the replay threat would be moot because there would be no alternative chain to replay the TX on, as the non-148 chain would have been reorganized into oblivion.
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Replay attacks make BIP148 and BIP149 untennable
Local Time: June 7, 2017 3:26 AM
UTC Time: June 7, 2017 12:26 AM
From: contact at taoeffect.com
To: Kekcoin <kekcoin at protonmail.com>
Anthony Towns <aj at erisian.com.au>, bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
I don't know what you mean by "render the replay threat moot."
If you don't have replay protection, replay is always a threat. A very serious one.
--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.
On Jun 6, 2017, at 5:19 PM, Kekcoin <kekcoin at protonmail.com> wrote:
Hmm, that's not the difference I was talking about. I was referring to the fact that using "post-chainsplit coinbases from the non-148 chain" to unilaterally (ie. can be done without action on the 148-chain) taint coins is more secure in extreme-adverserial cases such as secret-mining reorg attacks (as unfeasibly expensive they may be); the only large-scale (>100 block) reorganization the non-148 chain faces should be a resolution of the chainsplit and therefore render the replay threat moot.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170606/c710f263/attachment-0001.html>;
Kekcoin [ARCHIVE] /
npub195ā¦865as
2023-06-07 18:02:28
in reply to nevent1qā¦3uhj
Author Public Key
npub195njumzx87nj0gcqwhp76hy2ryqrdyrw6wden3z9wsvhcl7sex4q0865asPublished at
2023-06-07 18:02:28Event JSON
{
"id": "aae535f65a297d8e00cb00463eb15de5e51177944da657785e67e41d1d7c3dbc",
"pubkey": "2d272e6c463fa727a30075c3ed5c8a190036906ed39b99c44574197c7fd0c9aa",
"created_at": 1686160948,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"753128ff5203f7385f15743651b80e2131d69a7ed154ad15484c1ff10dea468c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"29f430e771d074dad3e4aeb58fbc49414ccdfc151020b4a6e3f63b32ed316047",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"1bd05a5503fb6854f03714081df3970b79306bc9f28bd4ec35add5b3317755d7"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2017-06-06\nš Original message:Please read my email more carefully; the replay threat would be moot because there would be no alternative chain to replay the TX on, as the non-148 chain would have been reorganized into oblivion.\n\nSent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.\n\n-------- Original Message --------\nSubject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Replay attacks make BIP148 and BIP149 untennable\nLocal Time: June 7, 2017 3:26 AM\nUTC Time: June 7, 2017 12:26 AM\nFrom: contact at taoeffect.com\nTo: Kekcoin \u003ckekcoin at protonmail.com\u003e\nAnthony Towns \u003caj at erisian.com.au\u003e, bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\n\nI don't know what you mean by \"render the replay threat moot.\"\n\nIf you don't have replay protection, replay is always a threat. A very serious one.\n\n--\nPlease do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.\n\nOn Jun 6, 2017, at 5:19 PM, Kekcoin \u003ckekcoin at protonmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\nHmm, that's not the difference I was talking about. I was referring to the fact that using \"post-chainsplit coinbases from the non-148 chain\" to unilaterally (ie. can be done without action on the 148-chain) taint coins is more secure in extreme-adverserial cases such as secret-mining reorg attacks (as unfeasibly expensive they may be); the only large-scale (\u003e100 block) reorganization the non-148 chain faces should be a resolution of the chainsplit and therefore render the replay threat moot.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170606/c710f263/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "d7879060edb1e7528b9d5052d0bbf88a39ac1656c336d5808c706b9ddc5f746d411fd8be3617be5dfb2c34df8bcf0725a6689e8319665b61fa6a186f7298a56b"
}