ð
Original date posted:2017-06-06
ð Original message:I don't know what you mean by "render the replay threat moot."
If you don't have replay protection, replay is always a threat. A very serious one.
--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 5:19 PM, Kekcoin <kekcoin at protonmail.com <mailto:kekcoin at protonmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hmm, that's not the difference I was talking about. I was referring to the fact that using "post-chainsplit coinbases from the non-148 chain" to unilaterally (ie. can be done without action on the 148-chain) taint coins is more secure in extreme-adverserial cases such as secret-mining reorg attacks (as unfeasibly expensive they may be); the only large-scale (>100 block) reorganization the non-148 chain faces should be a resolution of the chainsplit and therefore render the replay threat moot.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170606/b2d1e1e6/attachment-0001.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170606/b2d1e1e6/attachment-0001.sig>;
Tao Effect [ARCHIVE] /
npub1r0âŠvdpg3
2023-06-07 18:02:27
in reply to nevent1qâŠ3xar
Author Public Key
npub1r0g954grld59fuphzsypmuuhpdunq67f729afmp44h2mxvth2hts4vdpg3Seen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 18:02:27Event JSON
{
"id": "29f430e771d074dad3e4aeb58fbc49414ccdfc151020b4a6e3f63b32ed316047",
"pubkey": "1bd05a5503fb6854f03714081df3970b79306bc9f28bd4ec35add5b3317755d7",
"created_at": 1686160947,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"753128ff5203f7385f15743651b80e2131d69a7ed154ad15484c1ff10dea468c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"135ea27a865f00bd1f02a6486ca478ac60495093e9971dc6dc947f35b6b00d5a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"2d272e6c463fa727a30075c3ed5c8a190036906ed39b99c44574197c7fd0c9aa"
]
],
"content": "ð
Original date posted:2017-06-06\nð Original message:I don't know what you mean by \"render the replay threat moot.\"\n\nIf you don't have replay protection, replay is always a threat. A very serious one.\n\n--\nPlease do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.\n\n\u003e On Jun 6, 2017, at 5:19 PM, Kekcoin \u003ckekcoin at protonmail.com \u003cmailto:kekcoin at protonmail.com\u003e\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e Hmm, that's not the difference I was talking about. I was referring to the fact that using \"post-chainsplit coinbases from the non-148 chain\" to unilaterally (ie. can be done without action on the 148-chain) taint coins is more secure in extreme-adverserial cases such as secret-mining reorg attacks (as unfeasibly expensive they may be); the only large-scale (\u003e100 block) reorganization the non-148 chain faces should be a resolution of the chainsplit and therefore render the replay threat moot.\n\u003e \n\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170606/b2d1e1e6/attachment-0001.html\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 801 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170606/b2d1e1e6/attachment-0001.sig\u003e",
"sig": "1b605ec526e2264491033a2798cb33be9691b4edba7e224a720b556fb314194cd84662fffdebe436a73f70e44fd74b2edffaf7e41750cc73ba3f9f320e494350"
}