twofish on Nostr: I couldn't make an incoming astroid go viral, but here you go. ...

I couldn't make an incoming astroid go viral, but here you go.

quoting
nevent1q…du4s

If you're a fan of Graham Hancock, you REALLY need to review my research.

Below are excerpts from Graham's book "Fingerprints of the Gods". If you review these excerpts and then review the portions of my research that I presented as a guest on multiple podcasts, you will find that I have a significant amount of compelling evidence in support of the things Graham talks about.

Graham writes:
“The evidence nevertheless indicates that some ancient people explored Antarctica when its coasts were free of ice. It is clear too that they had an instrument of navigation for accurately determining longitudes that was far superior to anything possessed by the peoples of ancient or medieval or modern times until the 2nd half of the 18th century. This evidence of a lost technology will support and give credence to many of the other hypotheses that have been brought forward of a lost civilization in remote times. Scholars have been able to dismiss most of the evidence as mere myth but here we have evidence that cannot be dismissed. The evidence requires that all the other evidence that has been brought forward in the past should be reexamined with an open mind.

Despite a ringing endorsement from Albert Einstein and despite the later admission of John Wright, President of the American Geographical Society that Hapgood had posed hypotheses that cry aloud for further testing, no further scientific research has ever been undertaken into these anomalous early maps. Moreover, far from being applauded for making a serious new contribution to the debate about the antiquity of human civilization, Hapgood until his death was cold shouldered by the majority of his professional peers who couched their discussion of his work in what has accurately been described as thick and unwarranted sarcasm, selecting trivia and factors not subject to verification as the bases for condemnation, seeking in this way to avoid the basic issues.”
…
“In brief, the argument is
1. Antarctica was not always covered with ice and was at one point much warmer than it is today.
2. It was warm because it was not physically located at the south pole in that period. Instead it was approximately 2,000 miles further north. This would have put it outside of the “Antarctic” circle in a temperate or cold-temperate climate.
3. The continent moved to its present position inside the Antarctic circle as a result of a mechanism known as Earth crust displacement. This mechanism in no sense to be confused with plate tectonics or continental drift is one whereby the lithosphere, the whole outer crust of the Earth, may be displaced at times, moving over the soft inner body much as the skin of the orange if it were loose might shift over the inner part of the orange all in one piece.
4. During the envisaged southwards movement of Antarctica brought about by Earth crust displacement, the continent would gradually have grown colder, an ice cap forming and remorselessly expanding over several thousands of years until it obtained its present dimensions.

...

We’ll come to further details of the evidence supporting these radical proposals later in this book. Orthodox geologists, however, remain reluctant to accept Hapgood’s theory, although none has succeeded in proving it incorrect. It raises many questions. Of these, by far the most important is ‘what conceivable mechanism would be able to exert sufficient thrust on the lithosphere to precipitate a phenomenon of such magnitude as a crustal displacement?’” We have no better guide than Einstein to summarize Hapgood’s findings.

‘In a polar region, there is a continual deposition of ice which is not symmetrically distributed about the pole. The Earth’s rotation acts on these unsymmetrically deposited masses and produces centrifugal momentum that is transmitted to the rigid crust of the Earth. The constantly increasing centrifugal momentum produced in this way will, when it has reached a certain point, produce a movement of the Earth’s crust over the rest of the Earth’s body. The Piri Reis map seems to contain surprising collateral evidence in support of the thesis of a geologically recent glaciation of parts of Antarctica following a sudden southward displacement of the Earth’s crust. Moreover, since such a map could only have been drawn prior to 4,000 B.C., its implications for the history of human civilization are staggering. Prior to 4,000 B.C. there are supposed to have been no civilizations at all.”

----------------------------------------------------

For those of you who are familiar with the portions of research I have presented on Once Bitten with I man; Daniel of the family prince; all rights reserved. (nprofile…hg79) (Episodes 444 & 514) or with Illegitimate Scholar (Episode 074), you may recognize a number of elements from Hancock's book that resonate extremely well with the information I presented on those shows.

Furthermore, I can offer Graham answers to other curiosities of his like why the pyramids are described as the place where gods are made and why Teotihuacan was called the city of the gods. It requires some definition of terms and a particular cosmological perspective but it works beautifully well.

I've got at least a couple dozen mysteries solved here.
Help me get on the radar.
Please spread my work.