npub1evueeq5nd8889t6hlpgssh3x45a2q4sv9trffrux3jssamshwecqrzuf5t (npub1evu…uf5t) npub1llzxpc6c3w92hczu49dsxcfqkp5tl9f5e30urrgf2v8tqnu7pkgsww08cq (npub1llz…08cq) I think my #IETF work could be eligible, but the scope is unclear to me -- on the one hand the type-of-contributions description reads like the "boring" everyday stuff (WG chairing, reviewing documents) is part of the plan, but the application form looks very project centric, as do the times (the "long term" parts are 6mo; that'd have worked for most of RFC9290, but that was the fastest doc I ever contributed to).
Can you help me reconcile those?
npub1fw…qnhyf
2023-08-09 11:51:45
in reply to nevent1q…mtr0
Author Public Key
npub1fwh05jl2ya7xf0wdur38h7zyts272jnfyn6f22an9622wcxe86esqqnhyfSeen on
wss://nostr21.comPublished at
2023-08-09 11:51:45Event JSON
{
"id": "fd7cfdabd445acad21138317970d9ec964370443e38ca19e9d50de8fa89737d5",
"pubkey": "4baefa4bea277c64bdcde0e27bf8445c15e54a6924f4952bb32e94a760d93eb3",
"created_at": 1691581905,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"cb399c829369ce72af57f851085e26ad3aa0560c2ac6948f868ca10eee177670",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"ffc460e3588b8aabe05ca95b036120b068bf9534cc5fc18d09530eb04f9e0d91",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"1d84baaed482f71310d6f8cb9d420c77d429474f6114b952737dc0c9ce19ccc6",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"3ef68672b5a78c720e038b657bcd213f2e1a41d2d272dd48836c701e3d8e4e13",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"3b600bd3d29063899f662cad7f7c73f6788517c5431c42275c24fb865c0141c4",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"t",
"ietf"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://chaos.social/users/chrysn/statuses/110859511734888619",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1evueeq5nd8889t6hlpgssh3x45a2q4sv9trffrux3jssamshwecqrzuf5t nostr:npub1llzxpc6c3w92hczu49dsxcfqkp5tl9f5e30urrgf2v8tqnu7pkgsww08cq I think my #IETF work could be eligible, but the scope is unclear to me -- on the one hand the type-of-contributions description reads like the \"boring\" everyday stuff (WG chairing, reviewing documents) is part of the plan, but the application form looks very project centric, as do the times (the \"long term\" parts are 6mo; that'd have worked for most of RFC9290, but that was the fastest doc I ever contributed to).\nCan you help me reconcile those?",
"sig": "2ec8a65fff54c291aa7aac6e2e61266c887f1124cfb12a097a771407c52b547f90ebdb5bda0eb810846a497c62927f969308af88f32e360f0b3b8adcdbcb3f09"
}