I just read this, and found it enlightening.
Jung… notes that intelligence can be seen as problem solving at an everyday level…, whereas creativity may represent problem solving for less common issues
Other studies have used metaphor creation as a creativity measure instead of divergent thinking and a spectrum of CHC components instead of just g and have found much higher relationships between creativity and intelligence than past studies
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/3/3/59
I’m unusually intelligent (Who isn’t?), but I’m much more creative, than intelligent, and I think that confuses people. The ability to apply intelligence, to solve completely novel problems, on the fly, is something IQ tests don’t even claim to measure. They just claim a correlation.
Creativity requires taking wild, mental leaps out into nothingness; simply trusting that your brain will land you safely. And this is why I’ve been at the forefront of massive innovation, over and over, but never got rich off of it.
I’m a starving autist.
Zaps are the first time I’ve ever made money directly, for solving novel problems. Companies don’t do this because there is a span of time between providing a solution and the solution being implemented, and the person building the implementation (or their boss) receives all the credit for the existence of the solution. At best, you can hope to get pawned off with a small bonus.
Nobody can remember who came up with the solution, originally, and that person might not even be there, anymore, and probably never filed a patent, and may have no idea that their idea has even been built. They just run across it, later, in a tech magazine or museum, and say, “Well, will you look at that! Someone actually went and built it! Isn’t that nice!”
Universities at least had the idea of cementing novel solutions in academic papers, but that:
- only works if you’re an academic, and at a university,
- is an incredibly slow process, not appropriate for a truly innovative field,
- leads to manifestations of perverse incentives and biased research frameworks, coming from ‘publish or perish’ policies.
But I think long-form notes and zaps solve for this problem. #Alexandria, especially, is being built to cater to this long-suffering class of chronic underachievers. It leaves a written, public, time-stamped record of Clever Ideas We Have Had.
Because they are clever, the ideas. And we have had them.