Alex Gleason 🐍🚬 on Nostr: WoT WoT WoT, but how do you have WoT on a relay? The only way is to seed it with a ...
WoT WoT WoT, but how do you have WoT on a relay? The only way is to seed it with a specific user's profile, so it has to have an "authority" anyway.
The only other way is to implement a Social Credit system for pubkeys, where pubkeys are only allowed to do certain things after they have passed the initial trials, over a period of time. Honestly this seems like a good solution to me, but I think people hate this idea?
The problem is that people on Nostr want to have their cake and eat it too. They want absolute freedom to be totally anonymous, ephemeral identity, to see and be seen by everyone. Yet they simultaneously don't want to be spammed by anonymous random accounts. I believe this is the true internal conflict that ReplyGuy exposes.
Proper WoT is not just critical for nostr to work, it’s critical for the internet at large to work. (Although “nostr” here could be used interchangeably with “internet”)
Producing garbage is extremely cheap and getting increasingly cheaper, or, said another way, it’s getting increasingly more expensive to discern what is garbage.
You either go with an authority that helps you remove 99.99% of the existing garbage or you use an approach that, much like cryptography, makes the cost of putting garbage in front of your eyes asymmetrically expensive.
We’ve tried the authority-first approach and it has led to the current state of manipulation, polarization and reduction of individuals’ agency.
Published at
2024-09-21 14:07:17Event JSON
{
"id": "70d236ee5ce3943e85bbc7d3590add7b6f1e0b2cc74fe313a2424aa0c3151501",
"pubkey": "0461fcbecc4c3374439932d6b8f11269ccdb7cc973ad7a50ae362db135a474dd",
"created_at": 1726927637,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"q",
"28e333441233ee73bd479b938b8e3ab87216c45477216755f6088d3b4f3ef8b9"
],
[
"p",
"fa984bd7dbb282f07e16e7ae87b26a2a7b9b90b7246a44771f0cf5ae58018f52"
]
],
"content": "WoT WoT WoT, but how do you have WoT on a relay? The only way is to seed it with a specific user's profile, so it has to have an \"authority\" anyway.\n\nThe only other way is to implement a Social Credit system for pubkeys, where pubkeys are only allowed to do certain things after they have passed the initial trials, over a period of time. Honestly this seems like a good solution to me, but I think people hate this idea?\n\nThe problem is that people on Nostr want to have their cake and eat it too. They want absolute freedom to be totally anonymous, ephemeral identity, to see and be seen by everyone. Yet they simultaneously don't want to be spammed by anonymous random accounts. I believe this is the true internal conflict that ReplyGuy exposes.\n\nnostr:note19r3nx3qjx0h88028nwfchr36hpepd3z5wuskw40kpzxnkne7lzusv9l7f7",
"sig": "1b8029bd2a5ace6b21e387c391ff48340e492603880a0ba2f36fa44403cb56ad53f97260b7bdea75be0b8540fdb860127a22f64f8359cc3d94f68ebb7fa8e872"
}